Posted on 09/26/2019 4:41:33 AM PDT by billorites
Release of the transcript of President Trump’s call with Ukraine’s new president makes one thing clear — the Democrats are focusing on the wrong guy. They’re trying to use this episode to impeach Mr. Trump. What the conversation shows, though, is that Mr. Trump was enlisting help to do exactly what he had promised to do, drain the swamp. The culprit on whom to focus is Vice President Biden.
The transcript certainly confirms that Mr. Biden was mentioned by Mr. Trump in his call with Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky. And that Mr. Biden’s son, Hunter, was also mentioned. This shows up on the fourth page of the five-page transcript, after the two presidents were talking about how America gives more support to Ukraine than do the Europeans.
The President brought up that the prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden’s work in Ukraine had been “shut down.” Mr. Trump asked Mr. Zelensky to speak with Attorney General Barr and Mayor Giuliani. “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great.”
Vice President Biden, Mr. Trump added, “went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you ·can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me.”
The bragging by Mr. Biden to which Mr. Trump was referring was about the state prosecutor looking into, among other things, Hunter Biden. The bragging happened at the Council on Foreign Relations in January 2018. The former vice president was on a stage with CFR’s president, Richard Haass. The video of it is on Youtube.com. Mr. Biden is talking one of his visits to Kiev.
“I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee,”
(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...
Imagine how much we would not know about the Deep State cabal, if PDJT not won.
And there would probably be mandatory gun turn-ins and social scoring by now.
dnc server was hacked and the information on it was damning for swinging the election to hillary and probably more electioneering misdeeds... the FBI could not be allowed to investigate due to all the illegal activity, so they hired crowdstrike, a big donor to the clinton machine.
if they can get a copy of the server, trump’s people, then the flood gates are open.
this will be an interesting summer of 2020.
The only ones who is surprised by Hunter Biden escapades and Daddy’s role in facilitating the PAY TO PLAY only reads the DemocRat Main Stream Media. And in New York state, except for those who read the WSJ and/or the NEW YORK POST, the population has been totally indoctrinated.
It is so bad here, that Governor Andrew “YOU (CONSERVATIVES) DON’T BELONG HERE” Cuomo even had the Public Service Commission to put the TV Cable company, SPECTRUM on notice that HE did not like their practices.....what followed was Spectrum News broadcasting having about 5 to 8 minutes of DemocRat “Press” Announcements out of every 30 minutes of “NEWS” broadcasting. Also, obviously some local DemocRat politicians, appear to be notified where the cameras will be filming (an additional perk, or perhaps they have a relative or significant other who works for the station....
Wow! This guy Pinchuk sounds like a living-breathing, real life Victor Mins (aka Conrad Stonebanks)... Where’s Barney Ross and the team when you need them?
When faced with an unpleasant reality, the media just changes it and reports what it wants us to think.
Oh Crowdstrike!,,,,
Imagine a company of tech nerdies, who do cyber investigations, whose startup money was from a company owned by a former nazi and wanted war criminal GEORGE SOROS. Also imagine that company getting funded from the Democratic National Committee, or DNC. Funded by democrats, entangled with democrats, and employed by democrats.
Now imagine that this company, gave FALSE cyber security reports to the UKRAINE about casualties that never happened during a war with Russia. Imagine....just for a second, that they have been accused of ‘faking it” by other customers.
Now imagine that this cyber security firm, was tasked to investigate the DNC server. They report that it was hacked by Russians. However, they never file a FINAL report or provide legitimate police access to the server.
Imagine next, that an entire political party blames an incoming POTUS for being TREASONOUS based upon this report. Imagine that a young Creighton University graduate, working for the DNC is suddenly killed in a robbery for unknown reasons. However, it is suspected that he leaked to Wikileaks, but of coarse he wasn’t POLITICALLY MURDERED because it was a Russian Hack according to this cyber security firm.
So...The DNC server and Crowdstrike are center to the story line that the Russians did it, and Not Seth Rich, and that Trump is a traitor. Further, if mueller took crowdstrikes word for it, and never went to NSA to trace Seth Rich or communications to Wikileaks, never examined the alleged server, he was the cop that never checked the bullets in the body or gun with finger prints at the scene....
The actual DNC server, if it exists and can be examined, will settle perhaps the greatest soft coup attempt in the history of the US. Also, it may begin movement for justice for Seth Rich. Further, those revelations would destroy the media, the deep state, and the democrats.
The democrats, deep state, Clinton’s, Obama, media could survive without Joe Biden...... it was the mention of Crowdstrike and the DNC server that was the dog whistle.
The FBI could not 'investigate' the DNC Server because....... it was in the UKRAINE.
That is where it is now, and where it was then.
What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google
03/24/2017
“It has long been thought that because of the file timestamps, the emails were downloaded to a thumb drive, not hacked remotely, because the data transfer rates were much faster than an internet connection could support
Crowdstrike disagreed, and the Obama FBI/Justice Department went along with Crowdstrike”
Chances are Crowdstrike actions in part covered up the murder of Seth Rich.
Liz, you are awesome.
Every stinking democrat in office is trying to remove a duly elected president. When will America realize that the democratic party is an enemy of the state?
I’ve watched Austin TX turn to crap because of liberals from CA. My God, you can’t wear a T-shirt at school that has USA on it. Because it will offend the illegal aliens.
Sorry, shit face schiff is on TV now
Yeah, and we've seen what stalwart bastions of integrity they are. /s
Did you just listen to shit face schiff?
Such a lying ass.
He really needs to have Harry Reid’s exercise equipment.
I think this circus has been created so that when RBG dies, the left will say that a President under impeachment proceedings should not be allowed to nominate a SCOTUS justice.
If a Biden admits to crimes on camera, but the media refuses to report it, did it really happen?
(blush)
Can you translate that post for us?
Or have we become too stupid, stoned on pot, dumbed down via government education systems, lazy……….?
The natural disposition is always to believe. It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing. — Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)Americans all grow up believing in the fatuous theory that journalism is objective - and that there is competition within journalism. I blanch to think how many decades it took me to get it clear in my mind that journalism was systematically slanted towards the Democrats.It should always have been clear that the wire services are virtual meetings of all major journalism outlets. “Meetings” which have been in continuous operation since the Civil War and before (Samuel Morse’s demo of the telegraph, 1844. The ancestor of the AP, 1848). Thus, the following quote from Wealth of Nations (1776) is patently applicable to journalism: “
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.They even call the wire services the “Associated Press” or “United Press International” or such. What does it take to make clear that all major journalism is in cahoots??? The propaganda campaign which convinces people wholesale of the fatuous conceit that “journalists are objective” is, I submit, the “conspiracy against the public” which derives from the wire service journalism cartel. Nobody is naturally objective; nobody can actually be certain that their take on a particular news item is objective - no matter how many people may be with you in a mutual admiration society declaring that you are objective. But, journalists have an “out.” If they can’t be objective, they certainly can go along and get along with each other, and be unanimous. And that is exactly what they mean when they say, “objective.”And journalists know that they are negative towards society - that they are on the lookout for stories which suggest that society should be controlled more. To claim that “journalists are objective” is thus tantamount to claiming that “negativity is objective” - which can be endorsed only by a cynic.
“The republican principle demands that the deliberate sense of the community should govern the conduct of those to whom they intrust the management of their affairs; but it does not require an unqualified complaisance to every sudden breeze of passion or to every transient impulse which the people may receive from the arts of men, who flatter their prejudices to betray their interests.” ― Alexander HamiltonPeople who go along and get along with the journalism cartel are practicing on the credulity of the public.The journalism cartel must be sued into oblivion. The 1964 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to the contrary notwithstanding. And I know that Sullivan was unanimous. The famous Morrison v. Olson decision was nearly unanimous, too - but it is famously dead wrong. The difference between the Rhenquist Court in 1988 and the Warren Court in 1964 is that the Rhenquist Court had Scalia on it, and the Warren Court didn’t.
“Both Chalupa and her sister Andrea have strongly pushed the anti-Russian narrative on social media, in addition to advocating that the electors of the electoral college defect from Trump. “
This is also known as the elector-suicide-by-getting-yourself-on-the-patriot-target-list-in-cw2-strategy.
CrowdStrike. What an unfortunate name given the high-profile mass shootings over the past few years.
Sounds like another Podesta miscalculation. When the Podestas and Clintons finally turn on eachother, I wonder who will come out on top.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.