Posted on 06/25/2019 1:31:39 PM PDT by detective
E Jean Carrol made headlines recently with her rather bizarre and sketchy claims of a forced sexual encounter with Donald Trump in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room two decades ago. President Trump denies even knowing who she is…. but the media, well, you know…. OrangeManBad; so anything goes.
In addition to personifying an abject lack of credibility Ms. Carrol just imploded on CNN with Anderson Cooper, explaining her definition of rape is not sexual, nor doe it include sex. However, before getting to that recent development, a historic reference to Ms. Carrol is, well, weird.
(h/t BAXT3R) In 1995 E. Jean Carroll shares her unique perspectives on an Esquire article, “Do Women Love Men?” and discusses changing gender roles with Charlie Rose:
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
The video at the link is something to see.
Once she is thoroughly discredited, not future accusations will gain traction, one less vehicle of attack for lyin dems.
Is this the same old dingbat that said “Rape is sexy”?
Yeah.
I’m waiting for Judge Napolitano to shout out, “This is a very credible witness!”
“Has a Rather Unusual History of Perspectives on Men”
AND, so does the lawyer —BLOOM -— WHOSE MOTHER U can B sure, does also....mutter/dotter
Nutty as a fruitcake, as they say.
Nuts and sluts was an approach used by the Clintons to demean and attempt to discredit Bill Clinton’s multiple accusers.
This is very different. Her odd ideas are long-established and publicly pronounced.
I think Charlie Rose might have been egged on to commit his me-too crimes by this woman!
No need to go to the sundress blog. The video is right here, no clickbait.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mF9ONjUToI
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6t7v46
Go to the 41 or 42 minute of this Law and Order SUV episode. Sounds like she might have lifted the story from here
“Women love a man who comes in with a big ol’ club...”
Says the Rape Accuser.
She appears to be a fantasist as well as a fabulist.
Interesting that now “rape” is being defined as “not sexual” and “does not include sex”.
This certainly broadens the definition for the leftists to apply that term without limits to anything that offends them.
JMHO
I betcha Charlie ROSE under the table during that exchange!
O M G great find. Where did you get that?
Found on Twitter can’t take credit
Rape is sexy yo /s
How can a feminazi say she was “raped”? According to the feminazis, “all sex between a man and a woman is “rape.” I’ve heard them say that a million times.
Was she busy in 2016, that she didn’t come out with the rape accusations? I guess the Dems told her to be quiet until 2019. Another liar...
So rape, in her demented mind, isn’t rape-rape. Please, let Whooppi invite her on The View. They were all over the allegations a couple days ago - bad, bad Trump.
I have always rejected the leftist mantra (now almost universally touted by so-called conservatives) that rape is about violence, not sex. It is a Marxist ploy to separate people fron reality, as a political weapon. (They want all other sexual acts separated from morality, so they divorce this specific immoral act from sex.)
How many aggressive, ruthless males in history “raped” (took by force: the true meaning of the word) women just to make them clean the dishes or wash the laundry?
The term, raoe - not inherently sexual - came to be specifically associated with sex precisely because a male rapes a woman for evil sexual purposes, not for evil non-sexual purposes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.