Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David Schoen: Democrats' demands that Mueller testify are all wrong – They know he can’t discuss
foxnews.com ^ | 5/8/2019 | david schoen

Posted on 05/09/2019 12:48:41 PM PDT by bitt

Demands by Democrats that Special Counsel Robert Mueller testify before Congress about his report on Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election show a complete lack of respect for the rule of law and the constitutional provisions of the separation of powers.

With their single-minded objective of attacking President Trump, congressional Democrats are sending a dangerous message to the American people.

It is wrong for Democrats to demand that Mueller testify and it would be wrong for Mueller to do so.

When Mueller accepted his appointment as special counsel, he did so fully aware of the federal regulations governing his office. The regulations make it absolutely clear that the special counsel is prohibited from discussing his report publicly.

Leading members of Congress now demanding that Mueller testify know he is barred from doing so. The current special counsel regulations were passed while they were members of Congress.

In 1978, Congress passed the Ethics in Government Act. It created a process for appointing special prosecutors. This is a different position from special counsels like Mueller.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; mueller
David Schoen: Democrats' demands that Mueller testify are all wrong – They know he can’t discuss his report
1 posted on 05/09/2019 12:48:41 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


2 posted on 05/09/2019 12:49:08 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!'>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I would say let Muller testify.... and have the Repubs yield all of their time questioning to Jim Jordan and Mark Levin....


3 posted on 05/09/2019 12:51:29 PM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I’m ready for this circus to end but I wouldn’t mind seeing scumbag Mueller answer some of the Republican’s questions. I’d love to see the sob squirm.


4 posted on 05/09/2019 12:52:18 PM PDT by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Weasel Herr Mueller apparently hired someone somewhere to write his final Term Paper.

Total legal/academic FRAUD.

We demand at least a refund.

5 posted on 05/09/2019 12:59:41 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Mueller = sedition...


6 posted on 05/09/2019 1:00:01 PM PDT by glasseye ("24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think not." ~ H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

7 posted on 05/09/2019 1:01:54 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
They know he can't discuss...

but they can make a lot of noise about Trump defying their righteous demands for testimony and obviously doing it to cover up his Russian agentry.

8 posted on 05/09/2019 1:20:19 PM PDT by arthurus (vjju)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Years ago, there was a spate of "slamming" events.

Slamming was utility companies (usually electric) hooking people illegally with telephone solicitation by recording a "yes" response (f'rinstance) and then using that recording as a validation for services.

There were other ways, but you get the picture.

THAT'S all the dimwitocrats want are sound bites to be used against America so they can better get a foot into the 2020 election.

As it stands (imo), there's not a viable dimwitocrat able to win against President Trump

9 posted on 05/09/2019 2:22:35 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Ever wonder what Nadler and his band of criminals do on the weekend?

They practice.

10 posted on 05/09/2019 5:06:11 PM PDT by upchuck ("Bloggers" is the most abused forum on FR. Most posts made there should be in chat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
When Mueller accepted his appointment as special counsel, he did so fully aware of the federal regulations governing his office. The regulations make it absolutely clear that the special counsel is prohibited from discussing his report publicly.

Not so sure that is true in total. Sure seems like he can. See below.
Special Counsel Statute 600.9(c)

(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law
11 posted on 05/09/2019 8:03:03 PM PDT by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson