Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Dems show their contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law
Fox News.com ^ | May 7, 2019 | Charles "Cully" Stimson, Hans A. von Spakovsky

Posted on 05/07/2019 7:51:20 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 05/07/2019 7:51:20 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Until indictments happen in full force by Barr not much really going on that really means something.


2 posted on 05/07/2019 7:57:14 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nancy Pelosi is the one who filed false documents declaring Obama eligible to be President.
She filed a different form to Hawaii than the other 49 states.


3 posted on 05/07/2019 8:05:41 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Constitution means nothing to demon rats. They negated that flap of parchment when they successfully elected a foreigner to the presidency, with the complicity of the republicants of course. The rule of Constitution ended even before that though ...


4 posted on 05/07/2019 8:06:56 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is news?

I thought it was just SOP.


5 posted on 05/07/2019 8:07:31 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin

The RATs and some RINOs have been doing this for years.


7 posted on 05/07/2019 8:09:31 AM PDT by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Its us or them now.


8 posted on 05/07/2019 8:10:16 AM PDT by SecondAmendment (This just proves my latest theory ... LIBERALS RUIN EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Is there any reference for this claim? I’ve heard it before but never seen it proven. Any information to beat back liberal dummies is appreciated.


9 posted on 05/07/2019 8:14:39 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“What’s happening, then, is that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and his fellow Democrats on the Committee want to hold the attorney general in contempt because he refuses to violate a law passed by Congress!”

They know their low info voters won’t understand what’s going on.


10 posted on 05/07/2019 8:22:34 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Democrats are trying to demand that Barr break the grand jury disclosure law, and then will charge him with breaking the grand jury disclosure law. They are that cynical, and that evil.


11 posted on 05/07/2019 8:23:36 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This is what happens when you invest the entirety of your hopes and dreams into a single basket


12 posted on 05/07/2019 8:25:13 AM PDT by dsrtsage (For Leftists, World History starts every day at breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What the Dems like Gerald the Hutt are doing is the equivalent of a lawyer asking a witness, “So, when did you stop beating your wife?”

No matter what Barr does, he’s wrong (according to them). If he turns over the report in full, he will have violated the law (and, perhaps, ought to be impeached if he does so); but if he doesn’t turn over the parts that must be kept confidential, he’s “in contempt of Congress.”

Frankly, Barr ought to have Nadler charged with subborning a crime.


13 posted on 05/07/2019 8:25:30 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
"Is there any reference for this claim? I’ve heard it before but never seen it proven. Any information to beat back liberal dummies is appreciated."

The article sites the relevant law. This is not a new claim by Trump's people; it has been SOP for decades. Have you ever seen a government law-enforcement document released to the public, under any administration, that was NOT redacted?
14 posted on 05/07/2019 8:27:01 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

House Dems show their contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law


So? That’s like saying ‘summer shows its warm temperatures.’

The left thinks the Constitution is meaningless, and if you look at federal gov scope vs the Enumerated Powers clause, you’ll find we’re so far off the Constitution, it may as well be a bubble gum wrapper.

Sanctuary cities are just one example of Dem disregard for the law. None of this crap is new nor is it news.

The question is, what are we going to do about it?


15 posted on 05/07/2019 8:34:42 AM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

“Its us or them now.”

Yes. But, do enough of “us” fully understand that?

That we have not yet had a 5 Million Pissed-Off Patriot Faceoff in DC yet concerns me.


16 posted on 05/07/2019 8:46:46 AM PDT by polymuser (Hi It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged today. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Democrats on the Committee want to hold the attorney general in contempt because he refuses to **violate a law**.

They can never get out of the crime arena they love so much.


17 posted on 05/07/2019 8:57:14 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Steve - he wasn’t asking about the law, he was asking about Nancy Pelosi’s claim - see Lurkinanloomin’s post #3.


18 posted on 05/07/2019 8:58:35 AM PDT by jackibutterfly (Jesus drove a Honda,but didn't talk about it:"For I did not speak of my own Accord"John 12:49(KJV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

At work at the moment, will try to get you a link after work.


19 posted on 05/07/2019 9:12:10 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Thank you kindly.


20 posted on 05/07/2019 9:36:29 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson