Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/07/2019 7:51:20 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Until indictments happen in full force by Barr not much really going on that really means something.


2 posted on 05/07/2019 7:57:14 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nancy Pelosi is the one who filed false documents declaring Obama eligible to be President.
She filed a different form to Hawaii than the other 49 states.


3 posted on 05/07/2019 8:05:41 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Constitution means nothing to demon rats. They negated that flap of parchment when they successfully elected a foreigner to the presidency, with the complicity of the republicants of course. The rule of Constitution ended even before that though ...


4 posted on 05/07/2019 8:06:56 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is news?

I thought it was just SOP.


5 posted on 05/07/2019 8:07:31 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The RATs and some RINOs have been doing this for years.


7 posted on 05/07/2019 8:09:31 AM PDT by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Its us or them now.


8 posted on 05/07/2019 8:10:16 AM PDT by SecondAmendment (This just proves my latest theory ... LIBERALS RUIN EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“What’s happening, then, is that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and his fellow Democrats on the Committee want to hold the attorney general in contempt because he refuses to violate a law passed by Congress!”

They know their low info voters won’t understand what’s going on.


10 posted on 05/07/2019 8:22:34 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Democrats are trying to demand that Barr break the grand jury disclosure law, and then will charge him with breaking the grand jury disclosure law. They are that cynical, and that evil.


11 posted on 05/07/2019 8:23:36 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What the Dems like Gerald the Hutt are doing is the equivalent of a lawyer asking a witness, “So, when did you stop beating your wife?”

No matter what Barr does, he’s wrong (according to them). If he turns over the report in full, he will have violated the law (and, perhaps, ought to be impeached if he does so); but if he doesn’t turn over the parts that must be kept confidential, he’s “in contempt of Congress.”

Frankly, Barr ought to have Nadler charged with subborning a crime.


13 posted on 05/07/2019 8:25:30 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

House Dems show their contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law


So? That’s like saying ‘summer shows its warm temperatures.’

The left thinks the Constitution is meaningless, and if you look at federal gov scope vs the Enumerated Powers clause, you’ll find we’re so far off the Constitution, it may as well be a bubble gum wrapper.

Sanctuary cities are just one example of Dem disregard for the law. None of this crap is new nor is it news.

The question is, what are we going to do about it?


15 posted on 05/07/2019 8:34:42 AM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Democrats on the Committee want to hold the attorney general in contempt because he refuses to **violate a law**.

They can never get out of the crime arena they love so much.


17 posted on 05/07/2019 8:57:14 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The Democratic (Satanic) leaders of the House need RABIES shots as they are FOAMING at the MOUTH...


22 posted on 05/07/2019 10:27:16 AM PDT by topher (America, please Do The Right Thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"The subject of Abraham Lincoln's "Lyceum" speech was citizenship in a democratic republic and threats to American institutions. In the speech, Lincoln discussed in glowing terms the political system established by the founding fathers, but warned of a potentially destructive force from within. He asked his listeners:

'Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio or make a track on the Blue Ridge in a trial of a thousand years. At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer. If it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide.'- Abraham Lincoln, "Lyceum" Speech

Lincoln then warned that tyrannical forces could overtake the American political system from within. He said:

'It is to deny what the history of the world tells us is true, to suppose that men of ambition and talents will not continue to spring up amongst us. And when they do, they will as naturally seek the gratification of their ruling passion as others have done before them. The question then is, Can that gratification be found in supporting and maintaining an edifice that has been erected by others? Most certainly it cannot. Many great and good men, sufficiently qualified for any task they should undertake, may ever be found whose ambition would aspire to nothing beyond a seat in Congress, a gubernatorial or a presidential chair; but such belong not to the family of the lion or the tribe of the eagle. What! think you these places would satisfy an Alexander, a Caesar, or a Napoleon? Never! Towering genius disdains a beaten path. It seeks regions hitherto unexplored. It sees no distinction in adding story to story upon the monuments of fame erected to the memory of others. It denies that it is glory enough to serve under any chief. It scorns to tread in the footsteps of any predecessor, however illustrious. It thirsts and burns for distinction; and if possible, it will have it, whether at the expense of emancipating slaves or enslaving freemen. Is it unreasonable, then, to expect that some man possessed of the loftiest genius, coupled with ambition sufficient to push it to its utmost stretch, will at some time spring up among us? And when such an one does, it will require the people to be united with each other, attached to the government and laws, and generally intelligent, to successfully frustrate his designs. Distinction will be his paramount object, and although he would as willingly, perhaps more so, acquire it by doing good as harm, yet, that opportunity being past, and nothing left to be done in the way of building up, he would set boldly to the task of pulling down.'- Abraham Lincoln, "Lyceum" Speech

23 posted on 05/07/2019 10:51:01 AM PDT by loveliberty2 (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson