Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Democrats Prepare To Vote On A Subpoena For...
Townhall.com ^ | April 1, 2019 | Beth Baumann

Posted on 04/01/2019 4:12:27 PM PDT by jazusamo

The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday will vote on a resolution that would authorize subpoenas relating to Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report. If passed, the Committee would subpoena President Donald Trump's former Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, former Communications Director Hope Hicks, former White House Counsel Don McGahn, former Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, and McGhan's former Chief of Staff Ann Donaldson, the Daily Mail reported.

The decision comes after House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) and five other Democratic Committee Chairmen sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr formally requesting the full Mueller report.

"Each of our committees is currently engaged in oversight activities that go directly to the President's conduct, his attempts to interfere with federal and congressional investigations, his relations and communications with the Russian government and other foreign powers, and/or other alleged instances of misconduct," the letter reads.

According to the Committee Chairmen, Barr's summary is "not sufficient for Congress, as a coequal branch of government, to perform this critical work."

Barr told the House Judiciary Committee on Friday that he was actively working to provide a full redacted report to Congress. He expected the report to be ready in mid-April, although it could come earlier.

But a redacted version is far from what Congress wants.

"We — the members of the Judiciary Committee, the House of Representatives and the entire American public — are still waiting to see that report. We will not wait much longer," Chairman Nadler said in an opinion piece in the New York Times. " We have an obligation to read the full report, and the Department of Justice has an obligation to provide it, in its entirely, without delay. If the department is unwilling to produce the full report voluntarily, then we will do everything in our power to secure it for ourselves."

Nadler explains why Democrats continually push for the full Mueller report to be released:

The entire reason for appointing the special counsel was to protect the investigation from political influence. By offering us his version of events in lieu of the report, the attorney general, a recent political appointee, undermines the work and the integrity of his department. He also denies the public the transparency it deserves. We require the full report — the special counsel’s words, not the attorney general’s summary or a redacted version.

We require the report, first, because Congress, not the attorney general, has a duty under the Constitution to determine whether wrongdoing has occurred. The special counsel declined to make a “traditional prosecutorial judgment” on the question of obstruction, but it is not the attorney general’s job to step in and substitute his judgment for the special counsel’s.

That responsibility falls to Congress — and specifically to the House Judiciary Committee — as it has in every similar investigation in modern history. The attorney general’s recent proposal to redact the special counsel’s report before we receive it is unprecedented. We require the evidence, not whatever remains after the report has been filtered by the president’s political appointee.

There have been bi-partisan calls for a full release of the Mueller report. President Trump has also supported the report's full release.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 116th; agbarr; bannon; coup; democrats; hopehicks; house; judiciarycom; mcgahn; muellerreport; nadler; priebus; subpoenas; trumprussia; ushouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: jazusamo

This will all stop dead when we start going after their a##es, one by one


41 posted on 04/02/2019 1:46:58 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (nic dip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KyCats
Democrats fought tooth and nail to keep details of the Starr report hidden.

Starr was an "Independent Counsel" and Mueller was a "Special Counsel". Different laws applied to Starr.

42 posted on 04/02/2019 3:31:28 AM PDT by Go Gordon (I gave my dog Grady a last name - Trump - because he loves tweets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Has CNN presstitute Abilio James Acosta committed suicide after the Mueller report was released ??? Haven’t seen nor heard of the liar since ???


43 posted on 04/02/2019 4:11:01 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

AG Barr needs to finish the redactions required by law and release the mueller report to the President, Congress, and to the press at the same time. Make the whole thing available on the Internet at the same time,3:00 AM. Get it out before the spin starts.


44 posted on 04/02/2019 4:36:47 AM PDT by snowtigger (Deplorable, and proud of it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Yep, Little Jimmy has made himself scarce and I’d like to know the story behind it.

He either wised up, which I doubt or he got the word from high up to stop embarrassing CommieNN any further.


45 posted on 04/02/2019 8:12:26 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: snowtigger

I agree, whatever is released should be released to all at the same time.

There’s no doubt Nadler and fellow Rats will be spinning like tops otherwise.


46 posted on 04/02/2019 8:16:52 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Nadless, you POS...... be careful what you wish for.

The hate is strong in this one.


47 posted on 04/02/2019 8:57:05 AM PDT by A Voice (MSM = Enemy of the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If this thing gets out without too many redactions, the demonrats will be scrambling to cover up. Like rats on a sinking ship.


48 posted on 04/02/2019 9:25:03 AM PDT by snowtigger (Deplorable, and proud of it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: jazusamo

Hark, hark. The dogs do bark. Beggars are coming to town.
Some in rags, and some in tags, and some in silver gowns.


50 posted on 04/02/2019 11:21:41 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETCS

“Congress is seriously overstepping here.”

It seems that he claims that he is now a Prosecutor - in fact the supreme Prosecutor.

“The special counsel declined to make a “traditional prosecutorial judgment” on the question of obstruction, but it is not the attorney general’s job to step in and substitute his judgment for the special counsel’s... That responsibility falls to Congress — and specifically to the House Judiciary Committee”


51 posted on 04/02/2019 12:32:18 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: greymattr

There is that, of course.


52 posted on 04/02/2019 1:39:13 PM PDT by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson