Posted on 11/28/2018 11:23:48 AM PST by RoosterRedux
“FISA declassification will assure all the actors who tried to harm America are finally exposed,” George Papadopoulos wrote on Twitter last week. “Alexander Downer, the Australian government, UK, and GCHQ (British intelligence). If FISA is not declassified, these foreign governments will try to interfere again in 2020 to hurt Trump and the movement.”
...
“MI6 chiefs are secretly battling Donald Trump to stop him publishing classified information linked to the Russian election meddling investigation,” according to the story. “The UK is warning he will undermine intelligence gathering if he releases pages of an FBI application...”
“British spy chiefs have ‘genuine concern’ about sources being exposed if classified parts of the wiretap request are made public, according to figures familiar with the discussions,” continued the story. “‘It boils down to the exposure of people,’ said one US intelligence official, adding: ‘We don’t want to reveal sources and methods.’”
Fortune headlined its story, “Spy Games: Britain’s MI6 Horrified at Trump’s Plan to Declassify Details of FBI’s Carter Page Wiretap.” A lot of heavy weather is made about the threat declassification poses to “precedent.” But what do they mean by precedent? The precedent of a foreign government serving as an opposition research arm of the Democratic Party during a presidential election?
All of the British spy chiefs’ ostensibly high-minded anxieties are designed to distract attention from an enormous transatlantic scandal, one that has yet to be fully plumbed: that the only real collusion during the 2016 election took place between London and Langley. It took place under the hyper-partisan CIA director John Brennan, with Britty dual-asset oafs like Stefan Halper and British spies, both present and past (the Hillary-financed hatchet man Christopher Steele chief among them), putting in critical cameos — a spy ring that nearly catapulted Hillary into the White House.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
These criminals try to cover their crimes with the cloak of national security.
Let’s see what they’ve done.
‘We don’t want to reveal sources and methods.’
—
... because the sources are dirty and the methods are illegal.
Still....most Americans have no idea there was/is a coup d’etat to stop Trump from getting elected & to depose him from his rightful office once he won the presidency.
Trump simply has to release ALL documents otherwise, this disappears down the rabbit hole.
So frustrating.
Mr. President, declassify and release unredacted NOW, please! The American people deserve to know the truth.
****************
Trump needs to expose the subversive cabal and its foreign agents who were complicit in this nefarious plot. Nothing could be more important to this country than seeing who actively worked to undermine our president and our election process. Let’s see the truth!
America First, damn it.
The British are not now, nor really have ever been a friend of ours. The British tolerate us to the extent of how much we can do for them. If we can’t do anything for them they are the first out of the box to criticize everything and anything we do and jump on the America bashing band wagon.
Expose them and let the whole world know who they are it will be no loss for us.
The American people deserve to know the truth. Who cares if it implicates dirty actors in the UK!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It’s the dirty actors here that fear all of this will unravel all the way back to Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009 when both parties conspired to violate the Constitution.
That’s the truth they do not want the American people to know
Only in theory. Americas wars, and a number of other events, werent for the reasons in the history books.
Just do it.
We must see the truth.
The UK should get the same kind of ultimatum given to the Taliban after 9/11 - hand over the perpetrators or suffer the consequences.
They need to reconstruct the Lincoln conspirators gallows on the Washington mall.
If it takes down Brennan, then fine. The truth needs to be told.
That applies even more to the French. As Al Bundy once said on a London soapbox, "Is it just me? Am I the only one here who hates the French?"
If it takes down Brennan, that’s icing on the cake.
Are they seriously contending that their sources and methods are so precious that they can be misused to attempt to take down an elected President of the United States and still remain inviolate? Somebody needs a little priority realignment here.
The sources are rogue and the methods are seditious.////
Perhaps the sources weren’t so rogue. They might have acted with blessings from the top.
Imagine 0bama and David Cameron OK’ing an effort to prevent Trump’s election. Might explain why Trump has some reluctance to declassify.
****
PING.
“‘We don’t want to reveal sources and methods.’”
This excuse ranks up there with “xxx will discourage women and minorities from voting.”
IMO Brennan equals Hillary in downright nastiness.
The real collusion (and treason) was between a corrupt Obama intelligence agency officials that was part of the DNC and the UK government and other Commonwealth Countries (Australia and Canada).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.