Posted on 09/19/2018 4:43:56 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Kind of amazing? how people keep using the word “rape”
Especially in FR since every related thread posters have repeatedly said she never accused anyone of rape.
So, now she’s naming another person who was supposedly there. Thought she only remembered Judge and Brett. The demonrats will only claim PJ wasn’t in the room so anything he has to say is mute.
Trump on FOX right now asking why Dianne F. didn’t bring all this up back whenever instead of at the last minute.
She never said there was a rape or touching of exposed body parts.
Good. Time and time again, someone/s keeps bringing up rape.
Because he“””””How was this a sexual assault regardless?””””””””””
It wouldn’t matter if he was a Communist back then - what matters is that he is a Republican now. As witness all the allegations now about President Trump which have referred to ten years ago, when Trump was a Democrat.
You have a knack for twisting and exaggerating facts.
1. The accusation was ~1982, about 35 years ago. Not 40 years ago, when she was 10 years old.
2. Words have meaning Bill Clinton. And this sentence is not about the ‘IF”.
“If he raped her” has never been alleged until you- ‘goldstategop’ dumped it here on FR.
It’s amazing that you can’t discern the difference and persist to obfuscate or troll along.
“If he kissed her”
“If he fondled her”
“If he tickled her”
“If he tackled her”
“If Goldestate RAPED her” “If Goldestate Killed her” “If Goldstate tortured her” “If Goldstate brutalized her”
Because the Democrats—Feinstein-Pelosi- Schumer didn’t need a ‘mysterious woman out of the past’ of any candidate until Trump came along.
It doesn’t matter to the democRats that he denies it. Pure and simple that his name is included in this Cinderella farce in an effort to establish they were a couple of drunks.
Notice that this is NOT the same guy as “Paul Judge”, which the media previously assumed was “PJ”.
THis is a different person.
Paul Judge has also written a letter to the committee, saying he never was at a party like that, never did what she said, never saw BK to anything like that, and would not volunteer to testify because he had nothing more to say.
But now this new guy has come forward, saying he was known as “PJ”, was a friend of Kavanaugh, and ALSO was never at a party like that, or saw BK act in that way.
I suppose we’ll now here that this isn’t the write “PJ”, and we’ll have to go through every possible “PJ” that went to school with BK.
Well, I never did grope any woman when I was a teenager. But I know that a lot of people did, like for example Cory Booker, a senator on the judicial committee, who admitted that he once grabbed a woman’s breast without permission, and she had to fight him off.
I don’t see Diane Feinstein asking that the FBI investigate that, or that he be removed from the committee or the senate.
And if he is ever nominated for a judgeship, i don’t expect a single democrat to say that groping a woman in high school is disqualifying for him.
She said in her WP interview that she thought he was going to rape her, and that only his drunkenness kept him from being able to get her clothing off.
So she has made the accusation of “attempted rape”.
Wait, was it Paul Judge, or Mike Judge?
How many friends is she now identifying?
OK, that was entirely wrong.
Mark Judge is the guy she said was in the room.
Apparently, she has now said that another person, “PJ”, was AT THE PARTY, and this man is that person.
So now she has provided 3 statements that could possibly be corroberated; that she was at a party with BK, that Mark Judge was at witness to the assault, and that Pat Smith was at the party.
Of those 3 things, BK has denied being at a party where that happened, Mark Judge has denied ever witnessing anything like she describes, and PJ has denied being at a party where anything like that happened.
So, no corroberation, and 3 people on record saying the opposite of what she is saying.
Also, she has said two men were in the room, but her therapist wrote “4 men”, so to the degree that you would call a claim 30 years later “corroberation”, the therapist notes don’t actually corroberate her story either.
This one was not in the room but apparently was named by Ford as having attended the party.
“attempted rape”
She has said a lot of things. Still, attempted rape is not rape.
Correction:
“attempted rape”
She has said a lot of things.
Still, FEAR that you think you might be raped is not rape.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.