Posted on 08/18/2018 7:51:54 AM PDT by cotton1706
On Fridays broadcast of MSNBCs Rachel Maddow Show, former CIA Director John Brennan stated that he didnt mean President Trump committed treason when he referred to the presidents performance at the Helsinki summit as nothing short of treasonous.
Host Rachel Maddow said, After Helsinki, you were stark, and even a little bit scary in your criticism of his behavior. You said it rose to treason.
Brennan responded, I said it was nothing short of treasonous.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
If its not short of treasonous, its treasonous.
Backpedal fail.
He needs a chicago sunroof.
John (we have a double agent there) Brennan wonders why he lost his clearance papers.
Talk about a security risk the clown needs to be deprogrammed.
Brennan is just realizing the criticism of him is all true. He shooting off like a madman and it’s very wrong.
He abused his privilege and prostituted his clearance to make partisan political points.
Helsinki is not treason, nor is it the Holocaust, nor is it even Kristallnacht despite what these ahole talking heads say.
Brennan had no right of accusing Trump of treason. He is reckless with the Constitution as proven by his illegal spying on the Senate. Not a good actor.
IIRC, Brennan was the CIA station chief when Benghazi happened.
I hope he didn't have his sidearm on him when he started those back flips! We know how quick that can get out of hand. Oh sorry, that wasn't a spook that was a fibber.
he also said,
Brennan: I gave Trump a year to live up to the office. He didn’t.
Brennan gave himself the sole authority to decide whether a President ‘lived up to the office’ according to his standards and opinion. Which completely circumvents and delegitimizes any other opinion, such as that of the American people who elected the President
I said it was nothing short of treasonous.
Grammatically, that is *identical* to saying I said it was treason.
You either have treason or you have something short of treason.
If you have *nothing* short of treason you obviously do NOT have *something* short of treason. Therefor, you *have* treason.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Exactly the way l read it too
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.