Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What should marijuana opponents do when their cause fails? A lesson from Prohibition
The Boston Globe ^ | June 23rd, 2018 | Stephanie Schorow

Posted on 06/23/2018 2:47:03 PM PDT by Mariner

Some day soon, even as sweet, skunky smoke drifts in from the streets outside, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions and other staunch opponents of marijuana may draw inspiration from a true believer named Morris Sheppard. After the repeal of national Prohibition in 1933 and until his death in 1941, the Texas senator embraced a yearly custom. A progressive Democrat often considered “the father of Prohibition,” Sheppard would rise on the Senate floor to rail against alcohol and call for a repeal of Repeal.

“It was a ritual,” Daniel Okrent, author of the 2010 book “Last Call: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition,” explained in an interview. “Clearly he didn’t expect anything was going to happen. It was paying homage to his cause.”

Sheppard, a proponent of bank reform and an advocate of women’s suffrage, may have been the country’s most sincere Prohibitionist, but he ended up on the losing side of history. As such, he faced a dilemma that may soon become familiar to another group of prohibitionists: marijuana opponents. When society turns away from a cause, how long should its supporters fight on? After committing themselves to a lengthy, even decades-long struggle, how can they simply let it drop?

On July 1, Massachusetts will join states such as Colorado, Washington, and California, whose voters have chosen to legalize cannabis for recreational purposes. The implementation of the law has been bumpy, not least because Sessions and the federal Justice Department still have the authority to crack down on cannabis use.

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonglobe.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cannabis; depression; dopefiends; mania; marijuana; mrleroy; pot; potheads; prohibition; schizophrenia; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last
To: Mariner

I hear it all the time by the stoners.


41 posted on 06/23/2018 3:52:50 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Vision

We never got a Bill Of Permissions. What would you want “the approval of the Federal government” for, the ability to blow your nose?


42 posted on 06/23/2018 3:53:03 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
What should marijuana opponents do when their cause fails?

Concede defeat and move on.

43 posted on 06/23/2018 3:53:17 PM PDT by Simon Green ("Arm your daughter, sir, and pay no attention to petty bureaucrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision
Me, smoked a bunch. It's not like alcohol, it's bad for you

Me, smoked a bunch, drank a bunch - they have different effects but either can mess you up a little or a lot depending how much you use (and I've been both messed up a little and a lot on each). And both are bad for you. And none of that is any of government's business ... apart from keeping the messed up from driving, keeping it away from kids as criminalization has failed to do, and truth in labeling.

44 posted on 06/23/2018 3:53:20 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Argument by name-calling. How about being called one of the anti-freedomers?


45 posted on 06/23/2018 3:53:52 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
There are major health issues with marijuana that simply do not apply to alcohol.

And vice versa.

46 posted on 06/23/2018 3:54:53 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

It’s hard to argue that the repeal of Prohibition didn’t seariously harm the country.


47 posted on 06/23/2018 3:55:55 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Blowing your nose and acting like God- putting yourself into a state of euphoria on demand (with diminishing returns) while hurting your body, mind, and soul are not the same.


48 posted on 06/23/2018 3:55:58 PM PDT by Vision (Obama corrupted, sought to weaken and fundamentally change America; he didn't plan on being stopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I don’t know...ask Dave


49 posted on 06/23/2018 3:56:57 PM PDT by barbarianbabs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy
I hear it all the time by the stoners.

Do you hear it on FR? If not, why bring it up on FR?

50 posted on 06/23/2018 3:57:00 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The marijuana plant was originally banned due to lobbying efforts by the cotton barons. Hemp (from the marijuana plant) is far more versatile than cotton. Marijuana can be grown with very low levels of THC rendering it useless to smokers, but can be a valuable source of rope and clothing material.


51 posted on 06/23/2018 3:58:02 PM PDT by ExpatCanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud

Most people no longer smoke pot. Most use edibles and oils now.


52 posted on 06/23/2018 4:00:07 PM PDT by wrcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: barbarianbabs

Dave’s not here.


53 posted on 06/23/2018 4:00:15 PM PDT by Simon Green ("Arm your daughter, sir, and pay no attention to petty bureaucrats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
Prohibition did not cause an increase in crime.

False. The rest of your unsupported claims I will ignore.

"America had experienced a gradual decline in the rate of serious crimes over much of the 19th and early 20th centuries. That trend was unintentionally reversed by the efforts of the Prohibition movement. The homicide rate in large cities increased from 5.6 per 100,000 population during the first decade of the century to 8.4 during the second decade when the Harrison Narcotics Act, a wave of state alcohol prohibitions, and World War I alcohol restrictions were enacted. The homicide rate increased to 10 per 100,000 population during the 1920s, a 78 percent increase over the pre-Prohibition period." - https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa157.pdf

54 posted on 06/23/2018 4:00:16 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

As I said, the use of alcohol is not even comparable. It takes years of heavy drinking (exceeding the BAC considered to be impaired several times a week) to begin to cause equivalent damage to what even “casual” use of marijuana or other schedule one drugs causes. Marijuana causes physical damage and alters the function of the brain. Furthermore, our bodies have a dedicated metabolic pathway that exists only to destroy alcohol. We have no equivalent for any schedule I drug, so they stay in the body longer, exacerbating the ill effects of the drugs.

I can tell stories of addiction, too. The addicts I’ve known used a variety of substances. The addiction is the issue, not the specific drug used.


55 posted on 06/23/2018 4:00:40 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“””Argument by name-calling. How about being called one of the anti-freedomers?””””””

Anti-freedomer????

If you pretend it is a freedom issue then do you believe cocaine, meth and heroin must be legal?


56 posted on 06/23/2018 4:00:46 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Vision

“You got smart but wish the stupidity and waste of time on the rest of the country with the approval of the Federal government?”

What do you have to say about President Trump, who said he would support getting fedgov out of intastate mj regulation?

Here is PDJT throwing mj prohibitionists under the bus =>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M53XLBd54Y


57 posted on 06/23/2018 4:00:54 PM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing
It’s hard to argue that the repeal of Prohibition didn’t seariously harm the country.

It helped the country - crime dropped.

58 posted on 06/23/2018 4:01:44 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

>>Sheppard, a proponent of bank reform and an advocate of women’s suffrage, may have been the country’s most sincere Prohibitionist, but he ended up on the losing side of history.

Except that states and nations are pushing the BAC standard down to Sweden’s of 0.01 (CDC wants to go there incrementally first by dropping to 0.05 and then 0.03). A low BAC that results in misdemeanor in the US will still ban you from Canada as a “felon”.

And cigarettes? Banned by employers even in off hours, penalized by insurers and employers, prohibited in parks, cars with children, and in homes (look at California). And “tax the hell out of it”.

But pot smokers believe that they can toke behind the wheel and smoke in public because they are different after 50 years of demonizing tobacco and beer as “impure poisons” while promoting pot as “all natural” and saying it “cures cancer”.

There is neo-prohibition in this world of demon rum (restricted hours of purchase in all but 3 cities) but we aren’t supposed to notice.

The woman who founded MADD left that organization decades ago because even then it became apparent that the goal was neo-prohibition, she was never against its use even publicly. She didn’t like serious repeat offenders getting ignored or a slap on the wrist.


59 posted on 06/23/2018 4:02:43 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Spygate's clock began in 2015 - what did President Obama know and when did he know it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
It takes years of heavy drinking (exceeding the BAC considered to be impaired several times a week) to begin to cause equivalent damage to what even “casual” use of marijuana or other schedule one drugs causes.

Will you be posting evidence - or excuses for not posting evidence?

60 posted on 06/23/2018 4:02:59 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson