Rising CO2 could kill all the plants!! Then what are we supposed to do?? People!! This is serious!!
Better shut down that volcano in Hawaii, yessir.
Wait a minute.
I thought rising CO2 was the cause of warming.
Or has that story been changed because objective data show no warming at all for at least two decades?
The atmosphere of Mars is 95% CO2. Why isn’t it on fire? It is pretty cold out there.
Moving the goalposts again.
“Warming” wasn’t working.
Just plant more trees.
Have these people heard of photosynthesis, when plants absorb CO2 and release oxygen?
One of several propaganda global warming articles today.
“New climate models developed by researchers at the University of Bristol and the University of Oxford”
I thought the science was settled. Why are they wasting resources on more models?
The Day of the Triffids (1963)
Ping.
Pure unadulterated crap.
New climate models
...
Meet the new climate model, same as the old climate model.
NOT BACKTESTED.
Another fact-less article that begs the question - why?!
So what is the current level of CO2 expressed as a per cent of air at sea level? /sarc
The last time I looked, it was .04%.
Global climate change
Global SCAM!
Oh indeed
Don’t look at the volcanoes
The optimum CO2 percentage for many of our food plants is 1000 ppm. Right now its only 400 ppm.
We need to drive this up.
Yeah, well no shite Sherlock. When you can accurately predict, say just one year in advance, when and where hurricanes will strike then get back to me.
Because the old climate models were nothing but ... models.
Physicist Howard Hayden's one-letter disproof of global warming claims [pre-Climategate]Dear Administrator Jackson:
I write in regard to the Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, Proposed Rule, 74 Fed. Reg. 18,886 (Apr. 24, 2009), the so-called "Endangerment Finding."
It has been often said that the "science is settled" on the issue of CO2 and climate. Let me put this claim to rest with a simple one-letter proof that it is false.
The letter is s, the one that changes model into models. If the science were settled, there would be precisely one model, and it would be in agreement with measurements.
Alternatively, one may ask which one of the twenty-some models settled the science so that all the rest could be discarded along with the research funds that have kept those models alive.
We can take this further. Not a single climate model predicted the current cooling phase. If the science were settled, the model (singular) would have predicted it.
(excerpted from Professor Hayden's letter to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator Environmental Protection Agency. More at link.)