Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: i_robot73

Keep in mind a bill is only the first step. Implementing a bill will require guidelines to be written by bureaucrats. Generally this is where some form of an informed consent requirements would be established. To expedite the bill, I would think the informed consent already used by drug companies would be a requirement. Unless the Feds already have a consent form on file using the current standards established by companies would expedite implementation, take the government out of the process and of course limit Federal culpability.


24 posted on 05/23/2018 9:22:24 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angles will sing for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: OldGoatCPO

>
Keep in mind a bill is only the first step. Implementing a bill will require guidelines to be written by bureaucrats. Generally this is where some form of an informed consent requirements would be established. To expedite the bill, I would think the informed consent already used by drug companies would be a requirement. Unless the Feds already have a consent form on file using the current standards established by companies would expedite implementation, take the government out of the process and of course limit Federal culpability.
>

There doesn’t NEED to be Step #1. Fedzilla has ZERO culpability\authority.

Consent signed = contract between Rx & patient (MAYBE doctor to administer/etc.). Govt is only there to ensure the Obligation of Contracts (A1S10C1)


29 posted on 05/23/2018 4:57:13 PM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson