To: sukhoi-30mki
Probably a nice aircraft. But really, Sukhoi, is there a need for ANOTHER light, sub-sonic jet like this one? In what environment would it thrive better than existing jets and some turbo-prop attack aircraft?
Good luck to them.
Oldplayer
2 posted on
04/24/2018 9:33:00 PM PDT by
oldplayer
To: sukhoi-30mki
Defense Minister Karla Slechtova was quoted by local media as saying that the documents for the acquisition of the radars had not been approved by the Czech National Cyber and Information Security Agency, therefore, making it impossible to integrate them with NATO infrastructure. I will not accept such a major and dangerous order without connecting [the radars] to NATO, Slechtova was quoted by local news site Novinky.cz as saying.
D|ckless
4 posted on
04/24/2018 9:38:14 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
8 posted on
04/24/2018 9:52:39 PM PDT by
Shark24
To: sukhoi-30mki
Did anyone notice the L-159 in the background with Aero on it's Vertical Stabilizer has the "Williams International" logo on the side of the Fuselage? So will it be Honeywell Powered or Williams. Their was a firm @ Oshkosh 2 years ago promoting retrofitting old L-39's with the Williams Engine, and yes it had flown and I am not sure if it was this bird or not, I'd have to review my notes or pictures of it.
For those that may not know, converted L-39's are a hot item for the warbird / high disposable income crowd, their is an ample supply.
What I don't see it the 1/4-ellipse wingtips that multiple retrofitter's have developed similar to the photo below (for additional performance gains).
12 posted on
04/25/2018 2:56:00 AM PDT by
taildragger
("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson