Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jpsb

We bombed, very specifically, three chemical weapon sites. If Assad was not using chemical weapons on ISIS how did that strike hamper Assad’s ability to fight ISIS?

It didn’t. Unless he was using chemical weapons on ISIS, right?

Think!!


75 posted on 04/16/2018 6:53:26 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman

Under Obama (with help from McCain) we armed and trained ISIS, hopefully we have stopped doing that. Trump promised to get us the hell out of Syria, so why is he now bombing Assad? We have no business in Syria or on taking sides in their civil war. Bad stuff is happening all over the world, it is time to put America first, secure or borders, rebuild our manufacturing base and drain the swamp that is Washington DC. Plus I have seen no hard evidence that Assad was responsible for the chemical attack. If Trump wants to be a successful president he better get back to doing the things be campaigned for instead of doing the things he campaigned against.

I am starting to get the “meet the new boss same as the old boss” feeling and that is not good.


76 posted on 04/16/2018 7:05:46 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson