Posted on 04/15/2018 2:57:42 PM PDT by Simon Green
Particularly since the matching satellite BDA photos are posted on the Daily Mail
It seems like an awful lot of missiles were fired to destroy a small number of targets. At the Him Shinshar Chemical Weapons Bunker it looks like the target was, as the name suggests, an underground bunker so it may have required multiple sequenced hits.
I will be pragmatic and neutral and state that these questions should be asked to this administration. I can understand both sides of this argument. Right and wrong can be so subjective. I will say Syria takes away from the agenda at home and to a lessor extent gives more reason for the left to b*tch and moan i.e. more reason to think they can impeach.
We never learn from our founder’s words of wisdom:
“Avoid foreign entanglements” -
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/18/pentagon-wasted-500-million-syrian-rebels/
Especially since we have a 21 Trillion dollar National Debt, and our borders are a dangerous sieve for invaders, far more threat than Syria is.
The moral authority is using WMD against international law.
But you knew that...
Just after the Friday markets attack occurred a mere day before Chemical Weapon inspectors were to arrive and conduct investigation of “Chlorine” gas attack on civilians.
Conveniently site of gas attack and related munitions were destroyed by the $200 Million dollar missile attack.
Deadly theatre in more ways than one.
You make some persuasive points, but good luck arguing with this crowd.
Donald Trump ran as a peace candidate and that is one of the main reasons I voted for him. In his major foreign policy speech in April 2016 he said "unlike other candidates for the presidency, war and aggression will not be my first instinct." It would seem that launching this Syrian attack just before the investigation of the chemical attack was to occur violates that promise.
In the same speech Trump repeatedly stated that every aspect of his foreign policy would be based on the principle of America First. How does this attack conform to that principle regardless of who used the chemical weapons?
I commend you for your persistence in pressing your point.
You know something we missed?
Yea, we missed terrorists.
You may be on the wrong blog site.
McCain’s terrorists did that. Not the Syrian govt.
I guess Putin is the equivalent to you of the Great and Powerful Oz?
I wondered too why advertise down to the nomenclature of what we used?
Welcome to FreeRepublic, having joined two whole months ago.
Who is WE, ya friggin' NOOB..?
Again, you are a clueless loon.
Screw you 2/13/2018 noob member!
Is there a time limit before comments are allowed?
I wore our Army uniform for many years. And you?
Hey Fstick,
Go tell our dead servicemen’s parents and loved ones just how great you think it is to send them in harm’s way where we have no legitimate reason to be in the first place, as President Trump repeatedly said not so long ago.
Why don’t you go there or send your kid?
Pentagon identifies US soldier killed in Syria ... - Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national...Proxy Highlight
Mar 31, 2018 ... Master Sgt. Jonathan Dunbar is the
second American service member killed in action in Syria since the United States began backing local forces.
American soldier killed in Syria attack identified as Jonathan Dunbar
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-no...Proxy Highlight
Mar 31, 2018 ... Master Sergeant Jonathan Dunbar
was killed in action alongside a British serviceman
Donald Trump ran as a peace candidate
George W Bush ran as an education candidate. That went out the window on September 11, 2001.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.