Ms MacLachlan replied: "I'm used to thinking of this person who is a male as male."
Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit popcorn.
I can see, because of their radical ideology, feminists in theory supporting the rights of 'transgenders'. It's all part of inter-sectionalism oppression; 'oppression against fake women is oppression against real women'.
But it must be driving hardcore feminists mad.
Men, disguised as fake women, are now competing with biological women and biological women are now losing to men pretending to be women.
Feminist must be suffering cognitive dissonance.
Feminism gets bit in the ass.
radical feminist has been warned by a judge to refer to the transgender defendant as a “she”
Nope. That’s it. That’s the line for me. The state claiming the power to own my brain. THAT judge would be making a life altering decision.
Stop with the entertaining of mental illness
I want to see radical feminazis put in prison for using the “wrong” pronouns. That would be the beautiful end result of all this insanity.
Hmmm.....Do UK courts still require witnesses to swear something like “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”?
I’d have said “yer Honor, I’m doing my best to comply with the court’s requirement as given in the required oath” or something.
Response to the judge: Did he change his chromosomes?
It is imprudent and illegal to show disrespect to a judge in the courtroom. It is illegal and unethical to lie under oath. I would simply avoid all pronouns when referring to this mentally-ill man. No matter how awkward or repetitive, refer to him by name or as “the accused”.
Since they say there is cultural appropriation, couldn’t they also say that a man or a woman saying they are the opposite of what they were born is gender appropriation?
why can’t the defendant just be called defendant?
You never go along with the delusions of the mentally ill.
“SHE-who-mutilated-her-dick” should be how they refer to her.
