Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/11/2018 1:52:08 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27

They could have just went to youtube


2 posted on 04/11/2018 1:53:03 PM PDT by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

This angers me considerably.

Mueller was not hired to investigate Trump’s life.


3 posted on 04/11/2018 1:57:08 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

why is a video, recorded in 2005, relevant to the price of rice?

Is MSNBC making up fake news again?


5 posted on 04/11/2018 1:57:24 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Sounds to me like a fishing expedition to help the democrats create fake Bimbo eruptions to influence an election.


6 posted on 04/11/2018 1:57:25 PM PDT by Rad_J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

This wasn’t even an accurate quote about what the Donald boasted. He boasted that the women would beg him to do said je-ne-sais-quoi grabbing (so stricken by his sex appeal would they be). That’s kind of adolescent for a 60 year old man, and he had to say sorry to Melania about it, but it’s almost hilarious when a whole government apparatus is going after tabloid accusations of alleged sexual shenanigans that happened outside of the White House and indeed the presidency itself.

Oh, oh, oh! Donald used to be a playboy! Stop the presses! Stop the world!


7 posted on 04/11/2018 1:58:24 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
" . . . also allowed the feds to seize evidence showing whether lawyer Michael Cohen tried to suppress damaging information about Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign"

Trying to shield your client from bad publicity is now a crime? "Spin" - the staple of all politics - is now a crime?
8 posted on 04/11/2018 1:58:39 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The American legal system is predicated on the notion that EVERY person is entitled to a legal defense and that client/attourney commo is PROTECTED:

THAT is why clients make disclosures to their lawyers.

If one’s lawyer can be physically raided, that means that disclosures made to a trustworthy attorney are STILL not protected.

Ergo, clients don’t make disclosures and cannot get a complete defense.

SO:

Since “TrumpIsHitler” we simply throw the basis for our ENTIRE legal system out the window...?

I don’t get it.


14 posted on 04/11/2018 2:02:39 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I feel way way better than I did on Monday.

MUELLER HAS ZILCH.

I’m just laughing at the fool.


15 posted on 04/11/2018 2:02:44 PM PDT by Conserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It all began in 1787; then went north w/lincoln; then an increasingly sharp turn Left+ ever since—the con has done as was intended...so here we be...
Don’t Forget To Laugh!
;)
TRUMP.45 IF??? We Can Keep Him???
Gunny G@Planet WTF?
+++++++++++++++++++++++


19 posted on 04/11/2018 2:11:27 PM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

.
So, the FBI acts on braggadocio?

They are history !!!!
.


24 posted on 04/11/2018 2:15:05 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I follow the “legal logic” of the warrant but it’s an exaggerated logic unworthy of a serious investigator. Stung by the Access Hollywood tape, Trump and Cohen conspired to suppress stories and it all amounted to an illegal campaign violation. If you’re an overheated Democrat ideologue.


29 posted on 04/11/2018 2:16:18 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Originally the Q crew said that Mueller was *really* investigating Hillary. That’s why Trump called it a, ‘witch hunt.’

Then Hillary started wearing a boot, which was seen as confirmation: she had been, ‘secretly arrested,’ and fitted with a boot-shaped ankle monitor.

To be consistent, there must be some way the Access Hollywood tape is incriminating to Hillary. She much have bribed somebody to use it against Trump, and Mueller must be about to indict her for campaign violations.

Because, of course, it’s always ‘about to happen.’ It never actually happens, but according to Q, it’s always ‘about to.’


32 posted on 04/11/2018 2:17:53 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Trump was the star of “The Apprentice” when he was caught on a hot microphone bragging to Billy Bush, then the host of “Access Hollywood,” about how his fame enabled him to kiss women and “grab them by the p—y.”

Not what he said.

Eddie Murphy explains entertainers getting P***y thrown at them, which is what Trump said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDQ1lxB0goY


35 posted on 04/11/2018 2:18:35 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

One question that I haven’t heard anyone discuss - whether pro- or anti-Trump - is whether Daniels’ demand for “hush money” constituted blackmail or extortion. To me, it seems almost the definition of blackmail, yet I have not heard the issue raised.


38 posted on 04/11/2018 2:19:42 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Why would it not be privileged ?


43 posted on 04/11/2018 2:22:29 PM PDT by Rock N Jones (1935)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

So now crude locker room talk that probably was simply Donald Trump trying to show he was one of the guys is now legal, what? Evidence?


44 posted on 04/11/2018 2:22:44 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Mueller has jumped the shark with this action.

The situation has reached the point that if Trump was to hold a press conference, go over the fact that everyone admits there was collusion, detail the corruption of the FBI, DoJ, Hillary’s acknowledged criminal conduct, Uranium One (Including Mueller’s role in it), Clinton pay-to-play when she was SoS, Clinton Foundation fraud, money laundering, Comey’s leaks which Comey admitted was to instigate an Special Prosecutor along with Trump enemies hired by Mueller (and don’t forget Rosenstein’s hiring of Mueller and Rosenteien’s involvement in the FISA corruption and cover up), the public would easily support a Trump decision to fire Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller, Strozk, and Page; among others.

No honest legal authority can question that this group of people are trying to unseat a lawfully elected President through Treason and Sedition.

Mueller has gone a bridge too far, and no one can deny it with his unconstitutional raid on Cohen. Mueller is unlawfully intimidating a number of witnesses.

Trump should order the release of all the FISA files and the 1.2 million documents immediately. If Sessions, Wray, and Rosenstein hinder the immediate release, they should be fired immediately.


49 posted on 04/11/2018 2:25:41 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
...the feds to seize evidence showing whether lawyer Michael Cohen tried to suppress damaging information about Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign

If the feds were after that kind of evidence, then, there was and is a much richer target for that kind of campaign wrongdoing on the Hillary campaign. In fact, I'm pretty sure that there is/was a lot of that kind of wrongdoing during Obama's 2 campaigns.

We should be getting a new special counsel to investigate the Hillary and her campaign. Another for Obama. And another for Clinton's 2 campaigns. Crimes were committed, and I don't think there is a statute of limitation for criminal activity during campaigns. So, if Trump did anything wrong, Hillary is a much richer target for investigations, and so are Obama and Bill Clinton. We could end up with end-to-end TV/radio coverage all day long with so many special counsel investigations.
52 posted on 04/11/2018 2:27:50 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“tried to suppress damaging information”

Like maybe Seth Rich ?


53 posted on 04/11/2018 2:28:36 PM PDT by Rock N Jones (1935)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What does any o this have to do with anything?


61 posted on 04/11/2018 2:47:48 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson