Posted on 04/08/2018 2:10:22 PM PDT by Magnatron
A higher loyalty? From what? To what?
Might mister Comey be suggesting that he has higher loyalty to something other than the USA and the rule of law? (I do not know, I'm just asking.)
I suppose that I could read his book to find out, but my reading list is already full, and with titles by authors for whom I have respect.
Who signed off on this book to be published? Rosenstein? And if he couldn’t comment under oath on ongoing investigations while he was Director, how can he comment now about still ongoing investigations as a civilian?
Yep, when incredibly, unbelievably she was scolding the voters. If she scolds the voters can you imagine what she is like behind the scenes?
The others who answer quickly are those who have the questions in advance.
Yep.
All these coming Big Ugly indictments... that just never get around to coming.
Best case = Little Homely: worst of the bad actors will be fired, or transferred to harmless positions, then business as usual.
Clinton and Obama running free is not justice, not rule of law. I do not care about the little patsies.
When it comes - conveniently too late to protect Trump - it will exonerate all the ring leaders like Obama. Then the Swamp will say it was painstakingly done by the book - every t crossed and every i dotted - and that the case is now closed beyond dispute.
I say sundance is intoxicated with skullduggery and has deluded himself.
He claims to be a Christian, but does not seem to understand that humanity is fallen, and there are no pristinely white hats, especially not in DC.
I trust Jesus Christ, not Sessions, and not sundance.
I would be elated to find that I am wrong - truly elated.
Lanny Davis has a book out claiming that Comey cost Hillary the eletion—she would have won if not for his announcement about Weiner’s computer.
Love to see an 80 year old woman patriot, show up at one of Comey’s event and just kick his ass bloody./
“Those documents are public and belong to us!!”
Ditto for the ALL the UN-REDACTED text messages between Strzok and Page. The excuse given for holding many back, or redacting some was because they were having an affair and it was “personal”.
That’s B.S. Wherever I worked, whether private or government, it was clear to all that any communication conducted on a company device — PC, cell phone, etc. — belonged to the organization. If you expected privacy, you were wrong. you’re right; every word created by any of these yahoos on FBI devices belongs to us.
Precisely!!
Yep, and Keynes was apparently a bigtime Paedophile, Harry Dexter White was a Soviet agent, as well as Henry Wallace (onetime Vice President); the UN was a “manufactured consent” type of operation foisted on America.
The League of Nations was not ratified in the US Senate, they weren’t going to be swayed. That’s one thing about Evil, it never seems to take a day off.
The background of the big movers and shakers in recent history is SUPER creepy. It’s so bad, you wouldn’t even believe it possible.
The “rules are different” when it comes to leftists, they aren’t even laws. It’s not a criminal investigation, it’s a “matter”.
Felonia Von Milhouse Pantsuit didn’t have any FBI agents showing up at her lawyers offices, no raids carting away illegal, unsecured computer servers, no sir. Nobody investigating millions of dollars of “pay to play” quid pro quo donations to phony balogna “charities”.
Washington city at this point is apparently just a huge criminal racket whose only purpose is to protect thieves and scoundrels as they loot the Treasury.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.