Posted on 04/02/2018 7:02:20 PM PDT by Kaslin
Did we take the red pill or the blue pill? Did we fall down the rabbit hole or not? What does a scanner see? The liberal news media has convinced themselves and their allies that no one is advocating the repeal of the Second Amendment; they just wrote several op-eds about it. This is all part of fever dream conservatives are suffering in the wake of the tragic Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in February; the Left has made this diagnosis through their computer screens. No one wants to strip gun rights. It’s all a dream—sleep. Sleep. Sleep. Fortunately, the Right is not that dumb. We know what common sense gun control laws are—and we know the end game. It is the end of the Second Amendment. It is confiscation. Expanded background checks are the precursor to a national registry. Banning so-called assault weapons gets the scary ones out of the way. Magazine limits seriously prohibits the ownership and sale of firearms since a lot of handguns and rifles, with the exception of carry guns, bolt-action hunting rifles, revolvers, and 1911s, carry more than 10 rounds. It’s a graduated chipping away of gun rights. It may not say explicitly its true nature, but it’s there. The March for Our Lives event explicitly showcased this, when the give an inch, they’ll take a mile. Still, the liberal news media is trying to convince us that the abolition of the Second Amendment is not part of the conversation (via CNN):
Democrats, generally, want tighter gun laws, there is no doubt. So do a growing number of Republicans. And as we documented, there is bipartisan support in opinion polls for things like banning bump stocks, limiting high-capacity magazines and even putting restrictions on guns like the AR-15. But it's hard to find polling on the idea of repealing the Second Amendment, which should tell you something. It hasn't really been a part of the national conversation.
It's actually not fun watching people writing about guns step on rake handles so often, it's honestly just irritating. pic.twitter.com/0ECIIFjXEC— David Rutz (@DavidRutz) March 28, 2018
That CNN posted on March 28, but just a day prior The Washington Post reported on a poll about abolishing the Second Amendment:
In his op-ed, [former Justice John Paul] Stevens praises the work of the March for Our Lives organizers and urges the group to “seek more effective and more lasting reform” via a “repeal of the Second Amendment.” He calls the Second Amendment a “relic of the 18th century,” concerned more with the balance of power between the states and the federal government than with individual gun rights.
But public-opinion polling shows that it would take a lot of persuading to bring the public around to that view. In February, for instance, the Economist and YouGov asked Americans whether they supported a repeal of the Second Amendment. Twenty-one percent said they favored such a proposal, compared with 60 percent in opposition.
Commentary’s Noah Rothman partially detailed the repeal crowd’s past history, along with their denial that the Bill of Rights is on the chopping block:
Did you hear? They’re talking about repealing the Second Amendment. It started with former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens and George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley. And it sure does seem like those calls prompted skeptics of American gun culture to echo their remarks. Turley and Stevens were joined this week by op-ed writers in the pages of Esquire and the Seattle Times. Democratic candidates for federal office have even enlisted in the ranks of those calling for an amendment to curtail the freedoms in the Bill of Rights. Of course, this is just the most mainstream invocation of anti-Second Amendment themes that have been expressed unashamedly for years, from liberal activists like Michael Moore to conservative opinion writers at the New York Times. Those calling for the repeal of the right to bear arms today are only echoing similar calls made years ago in venues ranging from Rolling Stone, MSNBC, and Vanity Fair to the Jesuit publication America Magazine.
Are you sitting down? You might be surprised to learn that none of this occurred. It’s only your vivid or, some might go so far as to say, fevered imagination. Rest assured, CNN host Chris Cuomo insists that “no one” is calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment. And even if they are, as Justice Stevens most certainly is, he’s a “boogeyman” who commands no influence or respect. Apparently, to suggest that anyone is calling for such extremist measures, and not universally beloved “common-sense” restrictions on firearms ownership, amounts to swatting at phantoms. Cuomo retreated into a familiar, well-fortified rhetorical trench—a place where other liberals can be found whenever basic firearm-ownership rights are called into question. Essentially, his contention boils down to this: You didn’t hear what you thought you heard.
We know this game. In Oregon, a church group is compiling signatures for a ballot initiative that would virtually ban gun ownership in the state. If we give them an inch, they will take a mile. The tragic shooting at Marjory Stoneman in Parkland, Florida was preventable; state, federal, and local authorities failed to enforce the laws that could have stopped shooter Nikolas Cruz from committing this heinous act, even from buying the rifle. No one chose to do anything. They anti-gun Left are a viral disease. They’re a recurring form of shingles. You may not see them all the time, but you’ll know when they come and say ‘hey.’ The battle continues—and in the fight to save our Bill of Rights, it’s not extreme to say ‘hell no’ to every one of their demands.
As far as I’m concerned, the public should be able to acquire and own any weapon that is used by the police, and that includes the AR-15. We know that the police themselves will not likely come to the rescue during a shooting, so who’s going to protect us? No one but ourselves.
AR-10s are better.
Just sayin’.
Leftists want to repeal the 2nd Amendment so we will be easier to kill..they say it everyday..with what they constantly say about Conservatives, how we are “Dying out” they want us dead..end of story
But they don't want to ban guns
“AR-10s are better.”
I’m beginning to look in that direction myself. The hardest part will be deciding on optics.
“.. boils down to this: You didn’t hear what you thought you heard. “
You didn’t hear what you heard.
AR-15 in 6.5 grendel is better than an AR-10. Just saying.
Don’t be so sure about that. Three rounds by weight for every round of 7.62 is a big advantage.
Too late. Too many of them admitted what they were all about on camera and in op ed columns and in the yougov poll showing 39% of the donkeys want to repeal the 2nd Amendment. Nobody is buying the lie.
Amendment IIA well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Here are quotes from two Democrats, before the Dem Party became the Hate America Party, that speak specifically to the premise of civilians using arms for war...
"By calling attention to 'a well regulated militia,' the 'security' of the nation, and the right of each citizen 'to keep and bear arms,' our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason I believe the Second Amendment will always be important."President John F. Kennedy
---------------------------------------------------
"Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible."
Vice President and Senator Hubert H. Humphrey
The primary and paramount reason for the 2nd Amendment was to protect the citizen's right to own and use weapons of war to fight, as civilians, any threat to our sovereignty foreign or domestic.
If anything ever went downhill, these libs would be crowding into my yard for protection.
That is NOT a "donkey".
Selecting a very popular round(s) for a first and second weapon makes more sense to me rather than selecting a weapon for a specific optimal round.
Obviously a personal decision....
Three rounds of 7.62 is a big advantage....
What is truly remarkable is that even a recent former Supreme Court Justice would flunk the most elementary test of the history of the Constitution.
Two essential questions are never asked --- or answered :
1. Can the Bill of Rights be amended or repealed?
2. Would our Constitution have been ratified and adopted without the Bill of Rights as written?
A little thought will confirm the right answers should be...
Why was the Declaration of Independence signed Aug 2, 1776 but the adoption of the Constitution took until May 29,1790? Transportation was slow back then, but not that slow! Would the Union exist today without the Bill of Rights?
The rational factual answer would make the ignorant "progressive" Dim Marxist liberal heads explode Coast to Coast.
It costs a very great deal of money to attack us on a state-by-state level, which is the current strategy. More important, the blithe assumption that once in place such prohibitions can never be overturned has been resoundingly shattered with the direction that concealed carry has taken nationwide and with the expiration of the AWB. Noise and media hysteria haven't carried the issue and they're not going to. And they might just kill the Dems' chances in November.
While the MSM is amphlifing the 2A protesters bs. The rest of us are going through NICS checks and buying ammo and upgrading memberships or joining the NRA. Now I’m nauseating and deplorable. Hate to burst their bubble but flattering me won t make me like them.
Darn journalists! "... the tragic Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School what in February?"
Regards,
Well, there was that bit about the Articles of Confederation which lasted several years, which kinda didn’t work and had to be replaced by the Constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.