Posted on 03/23/2018 6:08:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
With one presidential decision, America gained one of its boldest National Security Advisers, and lost one of its best cable news guests.
Roughly an hour after John Bolton, former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., was named as the replacement for the outgoing adviser H.R. McMaster, he appeared on Fox News with “The Story” host Martha MacCallum, who was loaded with great questions for a man known for his blunt assessments of the world scene and sharp views on the policies that best serve America.
She learned quickly that the new position changes everything for Bolton.
Amid stories of inner-circle discord over President Trump’s praise for freshly re-elected Russian President Vladmir Putin, she had to wonder if Bolton would speak disapprovingly of the congratulatory words that have alarmed so many, despite Barack Obama having done the same six years ago.
The advisor-designate made clear that his years of writing and speaking about countless issues have left a record he is proud of, but that his job now is to subjugate his views to the president’s. He did let on that the whole flap struck him as overblown: “I don’t consider it a significant point… I’ve said congratulations to a lot of people, foreign diplomats and officials, it’s a matter of being polite...It’s a matter of courtesy more than anything.”
Having gleaned a sliver of an answer on one issue, McCallum plowed forward, seeking newsworthy specifics on how Bolton’s strong views might inform the advice he gave the president. “I don’t think it’s appropriate to tell you what advice I would give him,” he replied.
Would he continue to oppose the Iran nuclear deal, creating conflict with Defense Secretary James Mattis, who has shown more tolerance for it? Does he expect his views on that, or anything else, to create conflict among the Trump national security team? Should we keep the military option on the table with regard to North Korea? Is meeting with Kim Jong-un a good idea?
“Same question, same answer,” he replied. Always with a smile, Trump’s newest team member made clear his thoughts and analysis were no longer for the benefit of the general public, but for his new boss.
He did intimate that he would not be shy in that setting: “If the government can’t have a free interchange of ideas among the president’s advisors, the president is not well served.” He also shared a story revealing that if his opinion did not prevail, he would always maintain awareness of his role, as implementer of presidential will. Harry Truman’s Secretary of State, Dean Acheson, he recalled, would often describe why they got along so well: “Neither one of us ever forgot who was president.”
Then, a story from his own service: If, as an Assistant Secretary of State under George H.W. Bush, some idea of his was simply not holding sway, James Baker would remind him: “The guy who got elected doesn’t want to do it.”
So as John Bolton the spirited commentator fades from view, I take comfort in the knowledge that if his views and passions will no longer be heard by me, they will surely be heard by the president during what should be a chapter that leads to even clearer evidence that this is an administration serious about the threats of a dangerous world.
There is something else Bolton is serious about, the one area he was not hesitant in addressing—leaks, of the sort that enabled the absurd Putin congratulation uproar to become a brushfire. “I was outraged by it,” he told McCallum, “It recalled earlier in the administration when somebody was leaking transcripts of the president’s conversations with foreign leaders. It’s completely unacceptable; you cannot conduct diplomacy, you cannot expect other foreign leaders to be candid and open in their conversations with the president if some Munchkin in the executive branch decides they’re going to leak the talking points or the transcript or any other aspect of it.”
Now there’s the John Bolton we know.
America will now come to know him with greater familiarity in his service to the nation and the administration, which will hopefully last longer than the tenure of his two predecessors.
There is healthy evidence of the wisdom of this choice in the panic of liberals who convulsed the moment it was announced. But there is also a part of the Trump base that might be uneasy, the voters who viewed him as unlikely to entangle America in further extended deployments in various hot spots.
Make no mistake, Bolton believes in the American military as a force for good around the world. He will never share the Trump view that going to war in Iraq was a mistake. But if he is to be taken at his word, he knows that he is not “the guy who got elected.” There is no evidence that his hawkish nature contains some strong urge toward new, large troop deployments anywhere.
But he shares the Trump view that the Iran nuclear deal is a disaster, and that North Korea should know every day that a military option is always on the table to address his missile adventures. That strong position, both men would say, has contributed to better North Korean behavior of late, and even the prospect of a Trump/Kim meeting.
Ronald Reagan famously said that no war in his lifetime ever started because America was too strong. If that is instructive, war is in fact less likely with a president unafraid to give voice to such strength, and a National Security Advisor willing to inform it.
I heard that McMaster was picked first because of clandestine military operations. Now that those have been completed, it’s time for tough diplomacy - enter Bolton.
Kind of like Trump changing out campaign managers at different stages of the election season: different people with different skill sets for different parts of the MAGA agenda...
Don’t know if it’s true - but I like to think so!
...
I’ve said this before. Trump has a long history of using specialists.
I voted for Trump.
I am very pleased with Trump’s choice of Bolton.
I only wonder why Trump waited this long to appoint Bolton.
Should have been done a year earlier.
Question for you, Alberta’s child,
Would you prefer Hillary Clinton or John Kerry to Bolton?
Or Susan Rice or Samantha Power?
Neither did Ambassador Bolton.
Was he a voice of reason in 1999 when he was calling for U.S. military intervention in Kosovo on behalf of the radical Islamic insurgency there?
Who was the moron who came up with this notion that Susan Rice, Samantha Power and John Bolton are the only three options for a senior post in the U.S. government involving foreign affairs or national security?
You may want to do some research on the subject before you post that.
He’s anything but a Swamp denizen - don’t believe me, watch and listen to the collective gasps heard in the swampiest neighborhoods!
Most important of all to me is that Bolton has the same opinion of both the State Department and the current iteration of our so-called intelligences!
Hopefully, he’ll bring on the quick exit of Sec. Def. Mad Pussy Cat Mattis (and let him take all his trannie lovers with him!)
Why do clueless Freepers like alberta post the same nonsensical sh!t on these Bolton threads?
Alberta’s child sounds like Barbara Boxer, assuming the pose of the ‘educator’ of others.
Especially one like Bolton (and Nikki Haley) who don’t fear the MSM.
I like what he said in 2008.
https://www.rt.com/news/john-bolton-kosovos-independence-a-danger-to-balkan-stability/
https://thesaker.is/bolton-eagleburger-and-rodmans-warning-about-kosovo/
My assessment of Bolton is based on his own track record — for better or for worse.
Kosovo's independence was only possible because the U.S. toppled the Milosevic government in Serbia in 1999. Bolton himself was a strong public advocate of this.
I voted for Donald Trump to keep @ssholes like this out of government.
Mine as well.
But hiring senior people like Bolton who would have been prime candidates for cabinet posts in a Jeb Bush administration sure doesn't inspire a lot of confidence from me.
"I probably speak for a lot of Freepers when I point out that I didn't support Trump just so he could fill his cabinet with the same @ssholes that Jeb Bush would have hired." -- posted on 12/4/2016 10:26:24 AM by Alberta's Child
Hopefully, he’ll bring on the quick exit of Sec. Def. Mad Pussy Cat Mattis (and let him take all his trannie lovers with him!)
LOL. Good one. That’ll leave a mark.
But hiring senior people like Bolton who would have been prime candidates for cabinet posts in a Jeb Bush administration sure doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence from me.
And you suggest who for NSA? Michael Savage? Chomsky? Give us a few names before dumping on a solid America First pick like Bolton.
Mr. President, Milosevic Is The Problem
Also note Post #5 in this old FR thread from 2009. The link there is dead because the people who had been running the "Project for the New American Century" have scrubbed most of their globalist bullsh!t from the internet over the years, but there's no mistaking what kind of man John Bolton is:
This guy has been engaged in an endless war-mongering campaign for years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.