Hard to argue with a large content hosting service blocking content which is borderline, or actually, illegal. They don’t want to be legally implicated when some moron DOES finish an 80% lower, makes a bump stock, attaches a 100-round mag, tacks on a homemade can, and then mows down a school.
I’m not approving such a ban, just understanding it.
Let’s know what the actual issue is before freaking out.
(And oh yeah would help if someone started making a YouTube, Twitter, & FB replacement. Not actually that hard these days.)
Mark naziberg will never allow any competition to facebook,.
> content which is borderline, or actually, illegal
Complete uninformed bullshit.