Posted on 03/19/2018 12:09:22 PM PDT by detective
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein gave a resume to the Senate Judiciary Committee for his confirmation to be Deputy Attorney General. In that resume, provided under oath, he falsely stated the dates at which he worked for Ken Starr’s investigative legal team.
Rosenstein testified to the Senate that he worked on Starr’s team beginning in 1995 and ending in 1997. Rosenstein said that he began working at the U.S. Attorney’s office in Maryland for the Clinton administration in the year 1997. However, records show that Rosenstein interviewed Hillary Clinton for Ken Starr in the Whitewater case on January 14, 1998.
Rosenstein’s official interview with Hillary Clinton lasted fifteen minutes and cleared her of charges stemming from the seizing of FBI documents on the former Clinton White House travel director.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...
Trey Gowdy, when answering a question, has a habit of going back to the very beginning to freight in the legal theory to justify his answer. He carefully dots every i and crosses every t.
However, he studiously avoids and ignores the stupendous fact that Rosenstein, the acting Attorney General, signed a FISA warrant, knowing that it was based on a fraudulent document and supposedly misleading a judge, although I believe it was a wink and a nod. Jeff Sessions does the same, takes Rosenstein out to a steak diner.
Trump has been noting the fraud in his tweets and that the whole investigation is a fraud. Gowdy and Sessions no doubt cast aspersions on the tweets to avoid addressing the truth contained in them.
The “stellar record” and “wonderful resumes” of all so many ex-Bush and ex-Clinton and ex-Obola bureaucrats in the WH, DOJ, FBI, IRS, DOE, DOD, and EPA depend always-ever-so-much on the democrat media in the ABCNNBCBS compliant press corpse repeating their own claims of having a “stellar reputation” and “wonderful resumes”.
It apparently impressed President Trump, much to all of our chagrin. I assume even he is deeply disappointed with his pick. But then some people are just good at hiding their true self.
You are really stretching it. There isn’t a prosecutor that would indict him, and no jury would convict him on that alone.
When Sessions’ DOJ indicts, tries, and convicts the corrupt deep-state swamp-rats, helping Trump and his team of patriots save the republic, you will owe him the most epic apology ever. It’ll be yuge.
Sessions is gonna do exactly what he has been doing. Nothing.
Re. to Lisa H. Barsoomian? Rod Roenstein's wife? Who works for the R. Craig Lawrence that represents Mueller/Clinton/Obama/FBI/Sebelius/Comey.
She also screens FOI requests while fogging her email address through NIH.gov (Nat'l Institure of Health)
Lisa Barsoomian’s legal cases can be traced in LexisNexis.
Facts on the ground:
After a year, the only grand juries and indictments have come from Mueller’s special counsel coup against Trump associates. The whole sequence of events that led to the corrupt state to assume control of the DOJ and implement a coup against Trump did not happen by chance. It was coordinated from the get-go with that rat bastard, Jeff Sessions.
Jeff hasn’t done sh!t except defend his and his BFF rosenstein’s honor when it has come into question— He refuses to do his job, refuses to appoint a second special counsel and refuses to step down.
He’s an unmitigated disaster.
Is it possible you’re underestimating Trump?
The DOJ’s mission statement:
The DOJ’s mission is to “enforce the law” and “defend the interests” of the country, protect it from “foreign and domestic” threats, seek “just punishment” for wrongdoers, and to “ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans.”
Jeff is doing a bang up job, isn’t he folks?
Jeff Sessions is a rat bastard? I think your rage is an insufficient cover for your ignorance.
Anything's possible, these days. Boys can be girls and girls can be boys. With me the possibility is high, even though I give the man credit and admire him greatly. 8>)
Sessions recused himself, under oath. Folks here are simply taking Jeff at his word.
No "apology" should ever be required for doing that.
Muellers investigation is based on fraud, nothing he uncovers during it is going to stand up in court, or on an appeal. Everything he uncovers is going to be fruit of the poison tree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.