Posted on 02/04/2018 9:04:18 PM PST by Helicondelta
I’ll vote for that... H*ll Y*a
Does the FISA court maintain regular court transcripts?
Does FISA fly by the seat of their pants?
FISA court has a small footprint. Does the court maintain an archive that is secure? Can the records be update and modified by the agency without the oversight of the judge?
Color me curious.
I bet they’re going to disappear.
As I understand it: He did not recuse; he was forced to withdraw.
How would anyone know who the FISA judge is and who appointed him. It’s a secret tribunal.
The Court sits in Washington D.C., and is composed of eleven federal district court judges who are designated by the Chief Justice of the United States. That would be John Roberts.
Looks like the Clintons and Obama put a lot of dollar bills into the "Diversity Lottery" for judgeships.
I remember Judge Sullivan. He tried to railroad Senator Ted Stevens during his trial. Stevens was targeted because his removal flipped the Senate to the Democrats - it was a completely political "prosecution." Sullivan turned a blind eye to prosecutorial misconduct for over a year, until the DOJ itself found more overwhelming evidence of fraud and abuse.
Maybe you need a new understanding...recuse flynn judge site:freerepublic.com
Whichever, he never should have taken the case.
It will be interesting to see what Carter Page does today.
His lawsuit is one of the things that will get the FISA approval document revealed.
From the link:
“Judge Who Presided Over Michael Flynn’s Case and Recused Himself — ALSO SITS ON FISA COURT!”
Such a tangled web.
<><> Judge Rudolph Contreras appointed by Obama, May 9, 2016 to the FISA Court.
<><> Just in time to surveil candidate Trump.
<><> CONTRERAS approved the flawed FISA order.
<><> Contreras was the judge on Michael Flynn’s case but recused himself.
EXCERPT.... the Democrat/fake media complex is challenging the claim in the memo that Andrew McCabe told the committee that “no surveillance warrant would have been sought” were it not for the possession by the FBI of the fake dossier.
This claim comes mainly from the notorious liar/leaker Adam Schiff, who has been caught in more lies about this memo and the process around it than a 9 year-old pick-pocket, so it is automatically suspect.
But this dispute is very easily resolved: Just release the transcript of McCabe’s testimony to the public. This is not hard. All of these criticisms of the memo can be resolved by releasing all of the underlying documentation upon which it is based. You can bet the Democrats will fight tooth and nail to keep that transcript secret, no doubt with the FBI’s help. When you see that happening, you know who is lying.
Just another day in panicking weasels and liars America.
There doesn’t need to be a special counsel. There needs to be a public trial. This needs to be done on C-Span by the Republicans. The Congress needs to be thorough, just (not fair) and stick to the law. But, it needs to be done publicly. This is the only chance that will ever happen to destroy demonrats.
Start naming light poles in DC with the names of Demonrats. People that live in DC need to start hanging Demonrat and Never Trumpers in effigy.
How about the Admin submit a FISA retroactive to the point where Hillary solicited FusionGPS solicited Steele (UK) solicited F$B flunkies...
Make deliberate abuse a capital crime and record all parts of all sessions for reference as to whether they followed the intent of the law....
*
In this case, a special prosecutor since the role will be to prosecute the crimes that the investigation has uncovered.
It’s not that secret.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.