Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Deceive with Statistics: Distortions Due to Diminutive Denominators (THE HAPPY INDEX)
American Thinker ^ | 01/10/2018 | Thomas P. Sheahen

Posted on 01/11/2018 8:13:14 AM PST by SeekAndFind

We all learned in elementary school that "you can't divide by zero." But what happens when you divide by a number very close to zero, a small fraction? The quotient shoots way up to a very large value.

Pick any number. If you divide 27 by 1, you get 27. If you divide 27 by 0.1, you get 270. Divide 27 by 0.001, and you get 27,000. And so on. Any such division exercise blows up to a huge result as the denominator gets closer and closer to zero. 

There are several indices being cited these days that get people's attention because of the big numbers displayed. But the reality is that those particular big numbers come entirely from having very small denominators when calculating a ratio. Three prominent examples of this mathematical artifact are the feedback effect in global warming models, the "Global Warming Potential," and the "Happy Planet Index." Each of these is afflicted by the enormous distortion that results when a denominator is small.           

 The Happy Planet Index

The "Happy Planet Index" is the easiest to explain. It is used to compare different countries and is formed by the combination of 

(a x b x c) / d. 

In this equation,

a = well-being – "how satisfied the residents of each country feel with life overall" (based on a Gallup poll)

b = life expectancy

c = inequalities of outcomes ("the inequalities between people within a country in terms of how long they live, and how happy they feel, based on the distribution in each country's life expectancy and well-being data") 

d =  ecological footprint ("the average impact that each resident of a country places on the environment, based on data prepared by the Global Footprint Network")


(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: happiness; statistics
How do the assorted countries come out? Using this index, Costa Rica with a score of 44.7 is number 1; Mexico with a score of 40.7 is number 2; Bangladesh with a score of 38.4 is number 8; Venezuela with a score of 33.6 is 29; and the USA with a score of 20.7 is number 108 – out of 140 countries considered.
1 posted on 01/11/2018 8:13:14 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Costa Rica with a score of 44.7 is number 1

I've been there quite a lot over the years. Top score if one lives in a gated community. Outside that protection, not so much. Federales are pretty tough outside the city. Lovely plants, almost alien in appearance and some of the best fruit on the planet.

2 posted on 01/11/2018 8:19:42 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Using subjective numbers and bad math as a political weapon.

Certainly there is no science here.


3 posted on 01/11/2018 8:19:54 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wow, based on the happiness index (US being red and Mexico being green), people should be fleeing the US toward Mexico in search of happiness.


4 posted on 01/11/2018 8:22:23 AM PST by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mark Twain said there are 3 types of lies:
1) Lies
2) Damnable Lies
3) Statistics

But now there is a new category:
4) Liberal Talking Points.


5 posted on 01/11/2018 8:34:55 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I love that article. It lays out the model math tricks and details the junk in junk out BS that is the AGW models and predictions.

They don’t just meddle with the actually input data (temperatures and such). They tinker with the math so that formulas will exaggerate the interpreted data. And “interpreted” is a key word there.

This proves there is very little science actually involved in the AWG fanaticism.


6 posted on 01/11/2018 8:35:29 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being rich or stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

Can you eat the fruit and drink the water?


7 posted on 01/11/2018 8:36:02 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Never had a problem with either.


8 posted on 01/11/2018 8:42:05 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3621509/posts

See
1 Dead, 800 Injured as 3.5 Million Catholics Follow Blackened Jesus Statue With ‘Miraculous Powers’

for a current example.


9 posted on 01/11/2018 9:20:04 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is more to statistics than trying to stuff all data into a Gaussian distribution. The key is Skewness and Kurtosis. Climate models tend to neglect these finer points.

https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2018/01/05/kurtosis-mpemba-temperature-and-history/

https://brownmath.com/stat/shape.htm


10 posted on 01/11/2018 10:23:55 AM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Lying with statistics.

In one of my college courses (many years ago) a professor gave the example of a race between a Russian car and a U.S. car. The U.S. car won. Russian news said, “Russian car came in second. U.S. car came in next to last.”


11 posted on 01/11/2018 11:22:14 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abclily

The originator of that example deserves a job at CNN. :)


12 posted on 01/11/2018 11:24:17 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
That's not all that's corrupted with FRACTIONS.

STEALING ELECTIONS WITH COMPUTERS and Technology Cybercrimes, watch Bloomberg's Digital Defense November 3, 2016 (19:40).

To better understand "THE MASTER KEY" to stealing elections with computers, watch:
I'LL NEVER TRUST ANOTHER COMPUTER COUNTED ELECTION AGAIN !

Things have changed!

Bennie Smith, a Memphis computer programmer, discovered HOW this is done through aDiebold Election Systems changed its name in 2006 to Premier Election Solutions.
Bloomberg's article titled How to Protect Against Election Day Hacking gives more proof of this by Memphis computer programmer Bennie Smith.
13 posted on 01/11/2018 11:30:46 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson