SHOCKING! College Student Argues in Favor of Killing Newborn Babies

Townhall.com ^ | Jan 06, 2018 | Todd Starnes

[Oshkalaboomboom]

When courts make it easy to kill the unborn, when governments advocate selective abortion to eradicate genetic defects (a la Iceland), why would anybody be surprised to read that the next step would be the already born? Life has been cheapened.

[reasonisfaith]

These attempts at philosophizing are just pathetic.

Building eductive arguments on a premise fit for third grade.

[BenLurkin]

Liberal art departments across the country need to be closed.

Stat.

[reasonisfaith]

Shows what happens when you allow half-baked thinkers like Peter Singer into philosophy departments.

[ALASKA]

Who writes this stuff? Do they get paid?

[Hildy]

Unless the baby is transgender.

[RitaOK]

Conservatives, ( the “patriotic” ) ceded academia to Marx decades ago. We even sacrifice our own children to the public school “system” and its curriculum so we can pursue our careers and go buy stuff. Then we march the kids off to college to be “finished”.

Tagline of mine works here.

[Rj Snows]

Words fail me, were a dying Society

[BenLurkin]

[Dr. Pritchett]

“The youth of today is ever the people of tomorrow. For this reason we have set before ourselves the task of inoculating our youth with the spirit of this community of the people at a very early age, at an age when human beings are still unperverted and therefore unspoiled. *** This Reich stands, and it is building itself up for the future, upon its youth. And this new Reich will give its youth to no one, but will itself take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing.”- Adolph Hitler, 1 May 1937.

Honestly, the First Amendment is what allows idiots like these college students to let us know the full stupidity of their ideas. I’m glad they let us know.

[AndyJackson]

I guess this is the problem with modern education. He likely thought Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” was a serious women’s reproductive rights public policy paper.

[dr_lew]

“It’s no different than this tree. It’s alive, but is it sentient? I don’t know. I cannot communicate with it.”

Well, maybe we should kill you, dead to humanity as you are."

[Crucial]

Why does the Left always want to kill everything that doesn’t contribute to their well-being, fun, ego and so on?

[AndyJackson]

Wow. Western philosphy has assumed that the soul is immortal from before the days of Socrates. Now a life can be snuffed out before the age of two because there is no soul.

One thing we know is that this student has no soul.

[plain talk]

That doesn’t mean that it is not almost always a terrible thing to do. It is, but that is because most infants are loved and cherished by their parents, and to kill an infant is usually to do a great wrong to its parents.”

Replace infant with slave and parent with owner and it's clear how these people view children.

[ifinnegan]

The guy is a moron and doesn’t know what sentient means.

[reasonisfaith]

Well universities are dying, that’s for sure.

[reasonisfaith]

deductive

[RitaOK]

You have a point. Certainly their free speech declares the certainty of our increasingly Godless and possibly imminent demise.

Knowing about it, however, is different from doing something about it.

The AH quote is eerie isn’t it. Thanks. I think.
Rita

[ifinnegan]

Shortly after Roe v a Wade, Phillip K Dick wrote a short story called The Pre-Persons. In it kids could be “aborted” up to age 12.

A couple articles about the story.

http://truthandcharityforum.org/the-pre-persons-saw-the-horrors-of-abortion-in-1974/

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/08/the_agony_of_the_prepersons_philip_k_dicks_attack_on_abortion.html