Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gregg Jarrett: Did the FBI and the Justice Department, plot to clear Hillary Clinton, bring down...
Fox News ^ | December 15, 2017 | Gregg Jarrett

Posted on 12/15/2017 12:34:24 PM PST by jazusamo

Full title: Gregg Jarrett: Did the FBI and the Justice Department, plot to clear Hillary Clinton, bring down Trump?

There is strong circumstantial evidence that an insidious plot unprecedented in American history was hatched within the FBI and the Obama Justice Department to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

And when this apparent effort to improperly influence the election did not succeed, the suspected conspirators appear to have employed a fraudulent investigation of President Trump in an attempt to undo the election results and remove him as president.

Such a Machiavellian scheme would move well beyond what is known as the “deep state,” a popular reference to government employees who organize in secret to impose their own political views on government policy in defiance of democratically elected leadership.

However, this apparent plot to keep Trump from becoming president and to weaken and potentially pave the way for his impeachment with a prolonged politically motivated investigation – if proven – would constitute something far more nefarious and dangerous.

Such a plot would show that partisans within the FBI and the Justice Department, driven by personal animus and a sense of political righteousness, surreptitiously conspired to subvert electoral democracy itself in our country.

As of now, we have no proof beyond a reasonable doubt of such a plot. But we have very strong circumstantial evidence.

And as the philosopher and writer Henry David Thoreau wrote in his journal in 1850: “Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk.”

Newly revealed text messages about the apparent anti-Trump plot are the equivalent of a trout in the milk. It smells fishy.

The Plans

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; comey; conspiracy; doj; dossier; fbi; fusiongps; greggjarrett; jamescomey; lisapage; mccabe; mueller; peterstrzok; robertmueller; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2017 12:34:24 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yes. Definitely!


2 posted on 12/15/2017 12:35:37 PM PST by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The answer is yes, now what is going to be done about it?


3 posted on 12/15/2017 12:36:35 PM PST by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I bet a Grand Jury would find out......................


4 posted on 12/15/2017 12:39:17 PM PST by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

DUH !!!!!


5 posted on 12/15/2017 12:39:44 PM PST by al baby (May the Forceps be with you Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Bump!


6 posted on 12/15/2017 12:39:50 PM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

TREASON anyone? If this is true, what else would you call it?


7 posted on 12/15/2017 12:40:37 PM PST by LeonardFMason (426)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Did the FBI and the Justice Department, plot to clear Hillary Clinton, bring down Trump?

What was that comma doing there?

Regards,

8 posted on 12/15/2017 12:42:22 PM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
As of now, we have no proof beyond a reasonable doubt of such a plot.

We certainly do. We just don't have all the details yet.

9 posted on 12/15/2017 12:42:36 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I wasn’t expecting them to charge Hillary, but then they can’t go after Trump and his people.


10 posted on 12/15/2017 12:43:36 PM PST by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yup.


11 posted on 12/15/2017 12:44:04 PM PST by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
...Republic.
12 posted on 12/15/2017 12:44:49 PM PST by HLPhat ("TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS" -- Government with any other purpose is not American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason

TREASON anyone? If this is true, what else would you call it?


“Extremely careless...”

Move along. Nothing to see here.


13 posted on 12/15/2017 12:45:01 PM PST by nesnah (Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason

Yep, indeed treason in my view.


14 posted on 12/15/2017 12:47:25 PM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; All

FACT: the FBI lovebirds were referring to an “insurance policy” that they thought could guarantee against the (unlikely they thought) event that Trump could be elected.

This was summer of 2016, so it would seem obviously to refer to the developing “dossier” and/or similar efforts. Also, of course, to the parallel effort to do secret FISA surveillance of Trump campaign and associates, although they were not able to get FISA approval until (with the dossier) the final weeks of the campaign.

Need to gather evidence to fill in blanks, of course, but there is no “insurance policy” to text about in summer 2016 unless there is ***something*** that the lovebirds thought could guarantee a Trump electoral defeat in Nov. 2016.

Given the timeframe of the texts, I don’t think it refers to anything after the election and I don’t think it need refer to anything like assassination (though of course that’s a possibility that must be explored). But most likely it refers to exactly what transpired, the energetic efforts of Deep State and Hillary workers to develop and deploy the “dossier” of vile anti-Trump allegations from Russian sources.

We must remember that there was a lot of effort to deploy this in the MSM before election day, it was shopped to many MSM outlets and did finally make it into a couple of articles around a week before the election, though it was so dodgy that most reporters stayed away from it.


15 posted on 12/15/2017 12:47:34 PM PST by Enchante (FusionGPS "dirty dossier" scandal links Hillary, FBI, CIA, Dept of Justice... "Deep State" is real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

Exactly. There is definite reference to an “insurance policy” to ensure that Trump could not be POTUS.

The general form of the plot is clear and unmistakable. The details must be filled in, but the existence and purpose of the plot is undeniable.


16 posted on 12/15/2017 12:49:46 PM PST by Enchante (FusionGPS "dirty dossier" scandal links Hillary, FBI, CIA, Dept of Justice... "Deep State" is real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It is very much like a trout in the spoiled milk.

smells more like a Tijuana Brown Trout in the spoiled milk.


17 posted on 12/15/2017 12:50:24 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If there is such a conspiracy at the top of the justice system of the US, it is unlikely the coup plotters can be purged by the system itself. They will move against the President and elected government with support from almost all of the Democrats and many GOPe infiltrators. Trump seems to be checkmated in any attempt to stop Mueller and the DOJ from within the system. Other mass actions will have to be considered, the military, millions marching on DC if Trump is impeached, or other innovative alt4ernatives, whatever they may be.


18 posted on 12/15/2017 12:50:33 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They may never actually bring a legal charge against Hillary, but this has certainly done a good deal to damage the remains of her reputation.


19 posted on 12/15/2017 12:51:26 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I have no doubt that the establishment of bureaucrats, ensconced in their libturd civil (dis)service such as these players at DOJ and FBI were absolutely engaged in criminal plots to subvert the entirety of the electoral process that brought DJT to the Presidency.
I have no doubt that the Clintoon Foundation is a criminal enterprise of the highest order.
I have no doubt that the Mueller investigation is rigged to clear the criminals and is a witch-hunt targeting DJT, his family and associates.

The saddest commentary, though, is that NO ONE, it seems, has the cojones to bring this thing tumbling to the ground, despite the weight of the accumulating evidence.

And, THAT is truly dangerous to the future of this nation.


20 posted on 12/15/2017 12:53:42 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. Mr Trump, we've got your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson