[drjimmy]

When it appeared Moore could win the Alabama court order the ballots to be preserved for a recount. As soon as the Jones win was announced the court declared the ballots could be immediately destroyed. Plays very loudly to court protected voter fraud.

Not true. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the electronic ballots did not have to be preserved, obviously well before the results of Tuesday's election were known. And the ruling came after it was sought by the Alabama Secretary of State and the State Administrator of Elections, who are both Moore supporters.

[butterdezillion]

It makes a nice cover story to have them support Moore right up to the time that the GOPee people like Mitch McConnell tell them they won’t get any funding for 2018 and 2020 if they don’t do the dirty...

What could possibly be the reason to make sure that known hacking of the voter rolls didn’t result in hacking of the vote tabulation? Why would anybody EVER want to destroy the evidence that would show whether a known hacking was actually effective in overturning the will of the people?