Skip to comments.
Trump Could Be Forced To Testify On Sexual Allegations — And If He Lies He Could Be Impeached
Business Insider ^
| 12-3-2017
| Haley Peterson
Posted on 12/03/2017 4:42:09 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: blam
21
posted on
12/03/2017 5:09:33 PM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So only Cankles can use the I dont recall defense?
I cant remember my brains in a blender its Jello!!!
22
posted on
12/03/2017 5:12:14 PM PST
by
9422WMR
To: blam
Communist political SMEAR only!
23
posted on
12/03/2017 5:14:44 PM PST
by
Lopeover
( The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
To: sphinx
This is a Paula Jones type of case. Clinton had to testify.Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997) was a federal civil suit. Does it make a difference that a State court is trying to force President Trump to testify?
24
posted on
12/03/2017 5:16:55 PM PST
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: blam
” ... could be ... if, ... could be ...”
25
posted on
12/03/2017 5:17:35 PM PST
by
pax_et_bonum
(Never Forget the SEALs of Extortion 17 - and God Bless The United States of America.)
To: blam
I don’t understand what the crime here is
“If” any of these allegations are true, enough time has passed they couldn’t be actionable and no suit should see the light of day.
In Several instances, “If true”, seems like he was coming on to them and was rebuffed.
26
posted on
12/03/2017 5:19:10 PM PST
by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
To: blam
BUSINESS INSIDER? You mean Henry Blodget’s liberal cat nip?
27
posted on
12/03/2017 5:20:13 PM PST
by
CreviceTool
(A Good Samaritan with a handgun saved my life...)
To: Vendome
28
posted on
12/03/2017 5:20:18 PM PST
by
combat_boots
(Pure rot at God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust!)
To: Jim Robinson
"Yeah, anyone can make an accusation and then force the POTUS to testify. /s"
Thanks for your reply above, describes the fake news that is posted these days as such dire possibles.
29
posted on
12/03/2017 5:20:24 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Build Kate's wall and keep the illegals out of America.)
To: blam
If there was a witness the suit would have been filed long ago.
Without a witness this is just an embarrassment.
Trump should simply have his attorney appear on his behalf and deny everything.
Refuse the summons of a State court.
30
posted on
12/03/2017 5:22:13 PM PST
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: blam
......”Trump ‘COULD BE’ Forced To Testify”.....
Trying to put pressure on and build their own story I see....same OLD CRAP...when he’s called tell me about it then.
31
posted on
12/03/2017 5:22:54 PM PST
by
caww
(freeen)
To: blam
Looks like the President can sue her for Defamation.
She made the Allegations and he denied them.
32
posted on
12/03/2017 5:23:59 PM PST
by
Kickass Conservative
( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
To: blam
It’s a defamation trial, not sexual harassment. She really has no standing either, but with judges these days...
33
posted on
12/03/2017 5:25:09 PM PST
by
struggle
(The)
To: blam
They can’t touch him until he is done with his term.
34
posted on
12/03/2017 5:29:38 PM PST
by
Vermont Lt
(Burn. It. Down.)
To: blam
Unless there is DNA evidence, then it is just “he said she said”.
Clinton left DNA evidence of his lies.
That being said, Trump should refuse to testify. He might face Civil sanctions and could default. A default judgment would have saved Clinton a lot of grief.
35
posted on
12/03/2017 5:31:07 PM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
To: blam
Can you say executive privilege ???
36
posted on
12/03/2017 5:33:52 PM PST
by
Lionheartusa1
()-: There is nothing DEMOCRATIC about the democrat party ,, stop using that term :-()
To: blam
Yup. It's all over now. Might as well hand the reins over to hildabeast and timmy kaine. Or not. 👹🍿🍻
37
posted on
12/03/2017 5:34:15 PM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: sphinx
Clinton had to testify. There is a pretty powerful recent precedent. Clinton could have simply defaulted. Then the only issue would have been damages. Clinton's biggest screw up was in actually filing an answer in the Paula Jones case. He should have just ignored it.
38
posted on
12/03/2017 5:34:47 PM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
To: crusher2013
They were certainly the NeverTrumper folks last year.
Since then, they are now “partnered” with uber-leftist, liberal rag Yahoo!.
39
posted on
12/03/2017 5:35:38 PM PST
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: blam
I wondered what happened to that woman. Now I know. She obviously was laying low... She’s the owner of Sunny’s restaurant in Huntington Beach, CA and even her own brother said her accusations didn’t bear scrutiny during the campaign. Wasn’t Gloria representing her at one time? Might have known Gloria hangs on like a pit bull.....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson