Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If I don't want bake a cake for someone's phony "gay marriage", no one should force me to.
1 posted on 11/22/2017 5:42:35 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

And yet still not one transcript from any of Hildabeast’s talks to all those bankers where she received hundreds of thousands of dollars. Not one, not even one? So the NY Slime is not interested in Hildabeast’s talks? /s


2 posted on 11/22/2017 5:51:24 PM PST by Fungi (A fungus for every life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I take it Jeremy Peters likes peckers?

There’s no such thing as fag rights or a ‘right’ to an abortion.


3 posted on 11/22/2017 6:04:00 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America...Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Jeremy is triggered. What a whiner.


4 posted on 11/22/2017 6:11:12 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
If I don't want bake a cake for someone's phony "gay marriage", no one should force me to.

Exactly. Ask a liberal if a fashion designer should be forced by law to design a dress for Mrs. Trump and let the fun begin.

5 posted on 11/22/2017 6:12:15 PM PST by libertylover (Kurt Schlicter: "They wonder why they got Trump. They are why they got Trump")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

It is unconstitutional for them to force you to glorify satanism or any other irrational demonic religion. Sodomy is a rite of Ba’al worship and Moloch worship and pagan worship where orgies with little boys on altars are a rite along with baby killing (sacrifice). Both are rites of demonic religions which are unconstitutional in OUR “justice” (virtue) System.

A Just Law can NEVER promote vice and unnatural evil, degrading behaviors like baby-killing or sodomy. As Justice Marshall stated, unjust law is “null and void” and we have a duty to disobey it. Only Christian Ethics which are aligned with Natural Law theory are used in a true (ours) justice system and it is all unconstitutional. Many judges need to be in prison for treason—for throwing our our Constitution.

We have allowed the word “justice” to be destroyed and mean “Vice” as we allowed evil treasonous judges to deem “marriage” irrational—and make it meaningless-—which is also Marxism and unconstitutional and demonic.

We need our Justice System BACK and our Language restored and rational again-—where all just laws promote “public virtue” as the Founders stated all Just (virtuous) laws do!!! As Cicero stated, when just laws promote vice, it is a matter of time before the whole culture will collapse. Vice breeds only vice. Also, Machiavelli stated the easiest way to destroy a military is promote vice in it....because power tends to corrupt anyhow. “ It is essential to only promote Virtue in the military”. Machiavelli

Just Law is based on Right Reason according to Natural Law. Sodomizing others is irrational and unnatural and a vice. It should still be a felony like it was for hundreds of years. By normalizing the rites of Ba’al worship and forcing it into a “Just” law (which removes Reason and Logic from law), it forces satanism, a religion, and irrationality on children.

BTW, promoting theft is also unconstitutional which is what the Marxist “welfare” system does. That is punishing virtue and rewarding vice and can’t be in a true Justice system. We have a MAJOR Vice System now.


6 posted on 11/22/2017 6:31:54 PM PST by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

“Fighting Gay Rights and Abortion With the First Amendment

Well, yeah. Somebody’s got to do it.


7 posted on 11/22/2017 7:14:01 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
The First Amendment has become the most powerful weapon of social conservatives fighting to limit the separation of church and state....

And yet we have been told that "separation of church and state" was established by the First Amendment.

The truth being there is an equivocation here. The term "wall of separation between church and state" did refer to what the First Amendment confirmed in a letter by Thomas Jefferson to a church that was afraid of the Federal government regulating the religious liberties of people in the various states. The Leftwing re-interpreted the words to mean that religious ideas should have no impact on the government at any level. They then actually repeated the idea that this foreign idea was what was established by the First Amendment, and maintained this idea for many years. And now this false idea is undercut by the actual First Amendment.

8 posted on 11/27/2017 10:59:12 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson