Replies

Speaking of money laundering----

DOJ NEEDS TO INVESTIGATE The Clinton Foundation's finances, and, pay to play relationships with foreign businessmen and foreign governments.......

ITEM---Some observers inside Germany believe the German government has some explaining to do for the Clinton Foundation donation that appears under the foundation's heading “Donors and Grantors”. There is also the question pending: how many German govt ministries gave money to the Clintons?“It seems German taxpayers unwittingly financed Hillary Clinton’s election campaign. Why does a German Ministry support the election campaign of a U.S. presidential candidate?” blogged Vera Lengsfeld — former civil rights activist and German parliamentarian”

ITEM---The Australian newspaper the "Herald Sun" ran an October 2016 article entitled, “Why have we donated to Clinton’s foundation?” The paper noted "Former Australian Prime Minister Gillard donated $300 million of our money to the Clinton-affiliated Global Partnership for Education.”

=======================================

That's one humongous amt of foreign govt money that fell into the hands of the conniving Clintons. The Herald Sun needs to dig deeper---to determine if any of that money took a circuitous route then landed back into the personal coffers of the donors. Could have happened like this:

BACKSTORY When he went to jail, investigators found Ponzi King Bernie Madoff had stashed billions offshore-----into a labyrinth of financial entities.

COLLUSION AND CONSPIRACIES GALORE Some $8.9 billion was funneled to Madoff through a dozen so-called feeder funds based in Europe, the Caribbean and Central America......a labyrinth of hedge funds, management companies and service providers that, to unsuspecting outsiders, seemed to compose a formidable system of checks and balances.

But the purpose of this complex architecture was just the opposite: the feeder funds provided different modes for directing money to Madoff in order to avoid scrutiny.....and taxes.

When Bill Clinton was at the height of the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, Hollywood was by his side, offering donations for his legal fees, and one significant donor was a man who is now going through his own sex scandal—Harvey Weinstein.

Billionaire Harvey Weinstein raised $1,422,683 for federal candidates and political entities between 1990-2016. That’s small potatoes for his 27 years of rank Democratism, sucking up to feminism and upholding so-called abortion rights as he rampaged and assaulted young women. Adds up to about $5300 a year. Something tells me there are a lot of cash payments off-the-record being paid. (hat tip outpostinmass2)

Crunching the numbers as outpost did does give us a sharper look at the political money game as played by the conniving Clintons.

Harvey also gave a bundle to the nefarious tax-exempt Clinton Foundation and perhaps to offshoots of the Clintons tax-free entities.

Did Harvey's donations to the C/F go to "do-good projects"? Or did they make a circuitous route? Maybe landing back into the Clintons eternal political scams?

====================================================

The Weinstein Company's remaining board members Ben Ammar, Lance Maerov told the Financial Times they were aware of Weinstein's alleged sexual assualt of Italian model Ambra Battilana Gutierrez in 2015, and had tried to remove him from the company.

Nor was this their first attempt to get rid of him: in 2014, they reportedly called for an investigation into possible "financial impropriety" by the producer, but were quashed by Weinstein's lawyers. At the time, the producer's contract stated that he could only be fired if he was convicted of a felony, a clause that remained in place until his contract was amended late in 2015.

SOURCE http://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2017/10/26/ronan-farrow-working-another-harvey-weinstein-expose-amid-new/

CONT

Do you know if any Clinton related organization gave money to the super delegates? I ask because I'm wondering how she had them all in the bag at the beginning? I understand most of the country save some of us here early on thought she would win. But the way the HRC campaign behaved it seemed like they knew they had this thing rigged top to bottom in a scheme that couldn't fail.

What I think happened is via campaign contributions the CGI or whatnot was buying the super delegates. I'm not sure that would even be illegal.

I read somewhere money would flow into a Canadian charity which has laws to protect those who are giving the money. Then the Canadian charity would forward the money to CGI now nice an clean as the Yukon snow.

Please understand this is just my theory no proof and I haven't looked yet.

...ITEM---The Australian newspaper the "Herald Sun" ran an October 2016 article entitled, “Why have we donated to Clinton’s foundation?” The paper noted "Former Australian Prime Minister Gillard donated $300 million of our money to the Clinton-affiliated Global Partnership for Education.”

This jumped out at me. Just goes to show the left is crooked everywhere. A small country (population-wise) could have used that amount of money far more wisely. We have private individuals donating and raising funds for cancer research, for example.