Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Excusing Rape in the Name of Art
American Thinker ^ | 10/21/17 | Robin Ridless

Posted on 10/21/2017 4:00:20 AM PDT by markomalley

The most striking thing about the Harvey Weinstein revelations is the complete, almost syndicated, nature of the imputed wrongdoing. Seamlessness characterizes all successful cover-ups, but this one appears particularly sinister because narcissistic illusion was the participants’ stock-in-trade. It was also their Achilles heel.

According to reports, gorgeous, soigné women who affected tough, powerful personas on and off stage were, behind the scenes, belittled and overwhelmed by this monstrous overlord. Those who thwarted his advances were bought off. Others who weren’t bought off were silenced by collusive media. Still others were consigned to anonymity, abandoned to their own confusion. And still more others succumbed to a blended state of normalcy and moral unease, accepting professional favors and working with the man who had degraded them, probably wondering: Did that happen? It seems no accident that the film head married a fashion designer. With Weinstein able to force actresses on his payroll to wear his wife’s designs on the red carpet, he could burn his alpha-male brand onto the bodies of an even larger harem.

Everyone, underlings no less than, it is rumored, his own board of directors, were pimping for him, which must have been the point. I use “pimping” both in a corporate and sexual sense. Reportedly, Weinstein had a provision in his contract obligating him to pay for any consequences from his predations. I mean, what went down when private investors came a-courting? Was Weinstein listed as a potential liability? How did they cap the risk? By number of serial episodes per fiscal quarter? By the percentage of victims algorithmically projected to resist? Did the company take out Key-Man Insurance on Weinstein for the eventuality that is now upon them? …

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: All

21 posted on 10/21/2017 5:22:22 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
Reportedly, Weinstein had a provision in his contract obligating him to pay for any consequences from his predations.

That will come back to bite hard, b/c all the people that knew about this provision---even the lawyers who drew it up---are now material witnesses.

The moral vacuity and scummy depravity of Hollywood is writ large in such a provision....b/c nobody at the winestein Company had the decency to notify L/E that crimes were being committed by this peckered monster.

They should be charged w/ aiding and abetting.

22 posted on 10/21/2017 5:25:21 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Oh geez!
OF COURSE HE DID!
Lol!


23 posted on 10/21/2017 8:58:25 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson