They learned from when we were doing it to them.
It appears that the NY Times has worked way, way harder at finding Russian propaganda on YouTube than any American voter ever has.
The slimes just doesn’t like that that the Russkies have better propaganda than they do.
DAISYDUKE WAKABAYASHI. What the...!?
So Hillary spent $1 billion on her campaign, but was torpedoed by some Russian Facebook posts?
Russia! Russia! Russia!
They learned from when we were doing it to them.
Why would the Russians want to reshape the U.S. political landscape to something more nationalist and more patriotic? Doesn’t serve their interests at all. Progs avoid that inconvenient fact like the plague.
So, the Russians documented the rage of Americans against the status quo and put it on facebook doing the job that the Slimes should be doing.
But, they, the Slimes, live in this Through the Looking Glass world in which reporting [by the Russians] is propaganda and propaganda by the Slimes is reporting.
Ctrl-left knows what business they are actually in. They just borrowed another word for it and think we are confused. Fake news is a good term for it.
Does the NYT mention their previously unpublicized connection to antifa?
Yet all ended up becoming grist for a network of Facebook pages linked to a shadowy Russian company that has carried out propaganda campaigns for the Kremlin, and which is now believed to be at the center of a far-reaching Russian program to influence the 2016 presidential election.
Amazing to see the influence of the supposed $100,000 in Russian FakeBook ads (although the MSM has never shown us the ads). Hillary’s campaign spent upwards of $1B. So $100,000 is 0.01% of that $1B, yet we’re supposed to believe this tipped the election. It amounts to a single snowflake in a blizzard.
American Pravda, NYT Part I – Slanting the News & A Bizarre Comey Connection!:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5854-qAqkM
*Within hours after a domestic melt down they knew every tiny detail about Tiger Woods' life.
*By noon following the 6:30 AM shooting the the congressional republican baseball practice they knew of every step the shooter had made for months including where he got his brakes fixed and the fact that he inquired about the quality of his tires.
*Before sun up after the shootings in Las Vegas they were in the driveway of the brother's house in Florida, had located several properties owned by the shooter and had tracked his girlfriend to the Philippines.
Yet, they never made an effort to locate anyone involved with the hate America indoctrination of Barack Obama, or report tips they had been sent. Even worse if their cover up of the Clinton Crime and money laundering syndicate.
Does anyone think they would not still be digging into the murder of Seth Rich if he had been a Trump campaign staffer?
Aren’t the Times and Russia allies in pursuit of worldwide collectivism?
Slimetools at it again. Lo! I see Russians yonder!
The NYTimes seems to think that Sputnik news influenced the 2016 Presidential election, even though Sputnik news only started broadcasting in July, 2017.
Wow. Those Russians are awesome. How did they do that? Every political consultant should be beating a path to their door, to wrest that knowledge from them. Building a political propaganda machine that goes back in time. Just wow.
Don’t do Facebook or NYT so I never even heard of these videos or pseudo-news crime. My vote wasn’t influenced by Russians, but it WAS influenced by Hillary Clinton!
Trump, otoh, is easy, a totally pushover. You can get anything you want from Trump with only a flattering compliment and a couple of meaningful donations to Trump and the Republican Party.
None of that could happen if Hillarity was POTUS. She's incorruptible and the Russians are afraid of her, and obama, too, btw.
Bullcrap. This whole think is bullcrap.