[Ancesthntr]

Yes, that’s what it is advertised as - which, apparently, is the whole “trick” being played here.

But if you read the article, it points out that the parts in question can be used to convert a REAL Glock to full auto - and mere possession of such a kit, even if you don’t use it to actually convert a Glock, is illegal.

[Edward.Fish]

But if you read the article, it points out that the parts in question can be used to convert a REAL Glock to full auto - and mere possession of such a kit, even if you don’t use it to actually convert a Glock, is illegal.

Ah, but how!?
The Second Amendment is clear that the keeping and bearing of arms shall not be infringed, and even the 'argument' that it only applies to the militia is circumvented in many states due to the State Constitution having verbiage similar to the militia consists of all able bodied males 16 to 45.

[Polynikes]

“and mere possession of such a kit, even if you don’t use it to actually convert a Glock, is illegal.”

Constructive possession, having the parts even if not assembled gets you an ATF visit.

I wonder how they reconcile selling threaded pipes and Ammonium 34-0-0

[lacrew]

"and mere possession of such a kit, even if you don’t use it to actually convert a Glock, is illegal."

Have you got a source for that? That is a very slippery slope.

[Charles Martel]

But if you read the article, it points out that the parts in question can be used to convert a REAL Glock to full auto - and mere possession of such a kit, even if you don’t use it to actually convert a Glock, is illegal.

If that's the case, than there's a high likelihood that this was an ATF trap from the get-go.