Nothing in the 1st Amendment allows the press to hide information about crime. Leaking classified information is a crime and, if the media have sources who committed that crime, the media can be forced to identify the criminals.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: advance_copy
Sessions won’t play the medias’ game. “No questions were taken”.
To: advance_copy
What’s the difference between WP and Wikileaks and Edward Snowden?
3 posted on
08/04/2017 12:02:34 PM PDT by
Fhios
(We're at the mercy of the SUV generation.)
To: advance_copy
Did the author forget the fox reporters harassed by the brown bomber’s DOJ over their source?
4 posted on
08/04/2017 12:06:57 PM PDT by
Mouton
(The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
To: advance_copy
I’m not holding my breath.
5 posted on
08/04/2017 12:06:58 PM PDT by
Fantasywriter
(Any attempt to do forensic work using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
To: advance_copy
Nothing in the 1st Amendment allows the press to hide information about crime. Leaking classified information is a crime and, if the media have sources who committed that crime, the media can be forced to identify the criminals. I like your response better than Sessions'.
6 posted on
08/04/2017 12:08:02 PM PDT by
FreeReign
To: advance_copy
That’s fine. The press will claim first amendment priveledge. The court will find contempt. They will spend time in jail and become the cause Celebrex....to wit Judith Miller
7 posted on
08/04/2017 12:08:36 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: advance_copy
If you are watching Sheppard Smith, you are watching MSNBC on Fox.
8 posted on
08/04/2017 12:09:14 PM PDT by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: advance_copy
I literally laughed out loud at the headline - Sessions won't do a damn thing. When it comes to the Swamp, he is all talk and no action. Mueller has only been at it for a couple of months and is already onto a grand jury. We are 7 months into Trump's presidency, and Sessions is just now talking about maybe going after leakers? What a joke. DHS is probably a better fit for Sessions at this point - he doesn't have what it takes to do the job that has to be done. There is blatant criminality that is pretty much right in our faces, and they can't make any arrests? Sorry, I'm not buying the excuses anymore, Lord knows the GOP has a freaking encyclopedia full of excuses. /rant
10 posted on
08/04/2017 12:14:14 PM PDT by
Major Matt Mason
(The U.S. Senate - where American freedom goes to die.)
To: advance_copy
Throw them in jail for being COMPLICIT in the crime of revealing classified information.
12 posted on
08/04/2017 12:17:39 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
Sessions said “Don’t do it.” - that should work.
13 posted on
08/04/2017 12:18:30 PM PDT by
PMAS
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
To: advance_copy
Let’s stop pretending these are reporters and start calling them what they really are: spies. Enemy spies.
To: advance_copy
Put them in jail until they talk.
19 posted on
08/04/2017 12:23:26 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
To: advance_copy
—Sessions MAY Force Reporters To Reveal Sources Of Leaks—
MAY??? That’s as much as we get? MAY?? Nothing there!
Trump didn’t say “I MAY keep my promises”... there isn’t any MAY/perhaps in his plans.
To: advance_copy
News sources are saying four people have been charged with leaking, but no names have been released by the DOJ yet.
22 posted on
08/04/2017 12:26:17 PM PDT by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
To: advance_copy
That’s it? That’s the big announcement on leaking he was going to make on Friday? Now a grand jury on the Trumpsha hoax but still no grand juries impaneled by the Justice department.
23 posted on
08/04/2017 12:29:33 PM PDT by
ichabod1
(Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
To: advance_copy
You criminals better watch out!
Sessions MAY lower the boom any day now.
29 posted on
08/04/2017 12:51:48 PM PDT by
Leep
(Less talk more ACTiON!)
To: advance_copy
The fifth offers protection against self-incrimination, but when there is no chance they will face criminal penalties, they cannot use the fifth. I’m sure that’s what he is getting at. The press has their well rehearsed protection of sources routine, but there is, in reality, no federal press “shield” law, nor should there ever be one. If there was a press shield law, leaking would be refined as an art form - the media would just become a massive leak conduit.
To: advance_copy
When did the press start claiming they have the First Amendment right to protect their sources even when the information is criminal by its nature?
33 posted on
08/04/2017 1:05:39 PM PDT by
jonrick46
(The Left has a mental illness: A totalitarian psyche.)
To: advance_copy
Unauthorized possession of classified material is a crime no matter who is doing it.
L
38 posted on
08/04/2017 1:15:46 PM PDT by
Lurker
(President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
To: advance_copy
Will he start waterboarding?
40 posted on
08/04/2017 1:27:35 PM PDT by
smileyface
(Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson