Posted on 07/25/2017 8:57:27 AM PDT by GIdget2004
Thank you for taking the time to answer. This is so fascinating. As I said, I am praying you are right. Thank you for sharing your insight and thoughts here. So very helpful.
I’m not assuming anything. I have no idea whether anyone lied or if it was an honest mistake. But if they did lie, then that was a crime.
It was reported that Paul Manafort illegally funneled $2 million from Russian-backed Ukrainians to US lobying firms. If that’s true, that was a crime.
I’m not saying that a crime was committed. I’m saying that there is probable cause for an investigation into possible crimes.
And I would also be really defensive if people were tossing around serious, but false, accusations about me, but I’d probably tone down my statements in public so I don’t draw undue attention or look like I’m trying to deflect anything. Trump’s not doing what I would do — but then again, he doesn’t usually do what I would do and he keeps winning. So I hope he proves once again that he knows what he’s doing. I’m afraid that bad/stupid behavior by his inner circle may end up damaging him.
1. Awan’s arrest accelerated Sessions’ timetable. Prosecution like this take a VERY BIG amount of time. Indictments are not issued overnight. I’m sure you’ve seen “The Untouchables” or shows like that where numerous stings occur simultaneously so that no one escapes and so that there is no coordination of story.
2. Because of this acceleration, the “27th” date that “anonymous” kept referring to had to be moved up to today and the “Leaker” announcement.
3. Assange tweeted that “DWTweets” is already under a sealed indictment. I don’t know how he’d know, but it’s interesting nonetheless.
4. I’m guessing that even with the accelerated timetable, the next announcements to follow after the “leakers” will be that x or y have been given immunity and that Lynch and possibly Combover are the next two to be investigated. The FIRST indictment is crucial. Trump’s DOJ cannot lose this case. It would be viewed as a bellwether.
5. Cankles will be the last. The case against her would have to be beyond air-tight. The fact that you have an ex-presidential candidate being arrested would be something that many, many Americans (who are not partisan) will be very reticent to accept. So the case has to be completely flawless.
Have Rush on now....he is again saying that something is going on that we don't see. :)
I am so praying for justice to be done. I really wish they could get BHO also.
Ok I think I get what you’re saying here. But still, if Obama had secretly pardoned Hillary would it count considering it was secret? Wouldn’t it be considered null and void? Even still, do you think Trump is already thinking he will have to end up pardoning his family for doing nothing?
Like many here I have been following your perspective on what might be going on here with Sessions. I keep my eye out for your posts. Thanks.
I do wonder about the Assange thing about DWS and a sealed indictment. I don’t find that on what I think is his twitter account, but I do find it on what appears to be a self-described parody account. I think that is maybe misinformation.
You’re right. However, given what we are learning about her, maybe parody no more?
She is a living parody. Imagine how an orange suit would complement her greasy hair . . . .
Yes it would count if not shared publicly.
It would be recorded w the DOJ which means Trump would already know.
I don’t believe they are covered by FOIA.
If I were him I would have gamed out all scenarios including pardons.
Being an ex-Presidential candidate who is so obviously a crook (criminal) is something we haven't seen before.
I think that most Americans—given the "Drain the Swamp" sentiments that even many working class Democrats secretly harbor—will be perfectly content to see the Clinton crime family prosecuted for political corruption and real crimes.
The fact that Hillary is a former Presidential candidate certainly shouldn't grant her any immunity whatsoever. I think the appetite of the People for prosecuting Hillary and her henchmen is more substantial than you realize, and the reticence would turn out being illusory.
This is especially true given the fact that the entire nation can see the Uniparty Swamp and Deep State trying to conduct a coup against its duly elected President.
When these indictments start to come out, the Media won't be able to ignore it anymore. And when the People start to grasp the scope of the subversion and self-aggrandizement that's been going on—including massive trampling of Americans' Rights by the previous administration—they're going to rise up en mass, demand action, and applaud President Trump's Justice Department as it begins to drain the Swamp in earnest.
To my mind, the entire MAGA agenda will be impossible to implement as long as the current environment of corruption permeates Washington DC. Draining the Swamp has become imperative—it can't be overlooked while MAGA happens, because MAGA simply won't happen if draining the Swamp doesn't happen.
I suspect that the 2018 midterms will be a critical turning point in this Revolution. If there's any Justice in this world, 2018 should spell the demise of the Democrat party, relegating it to minority status for decades to come. In 2018, it would be deeply rewarding to see a Legislative branch confirmation of what happened in the Executive branch in 2016...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.