This is beyond ridiculous. This is just more vicious anti-Trump propaganda.
The First Amendment gives people the right to speak, but people also have the right to not listen to them.
Trump doesn't want to read what some idiots are writing and he has the perfect right to that. Those people can post anything they want, so their First Amendment rights have not been impacted.
To: Innovative
Kudos to the lawyers who convinced a stupid client to pursue this kind of idiocy in a Federal court.
If there was any legal basis for what they're claiming, then why isn't Twitter named as a defendant?
2 posted on
07/11/2017 2:08:55 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
To: Innovative
Can I sue my Congressman if I write him an e-mail and I don’t get a reply? LOL.
3 posted on
07/11/2017 2:10:07 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
To: Innovative
There is no free speech protections on Twitter or Free Republic...duh.
4 posted on
07/11/2017 2:12:02 PM PDT by
Theoria
(I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
To: Innovative
Bullshiite.
There is a personal account @realDonaldTrump
and a public account @POTUS
If they’re not blocked from the @POTUS account, then they still have access to a public forum to air their views.
Trump being president doesn’t lose his rights to privacy, and though the @realDonaldTrump might be open to the public, he still has the right to limit those who have access to him.
People have the right to say what they want, they can’t force people to listen.
6 posted on
07/11/2017 2:16:08 PM PDT by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
To: Innovative
“This is beyond ridiculous. This is just more vicious anti-Trump propaganda.”
They know going out the gate that this is ridiculous, but they are seizing on any “opportunity” to try and gum up the works. It's just too bad we don't have better means of sanctioning this kind of activity. The fact is though, this is ALL THEY HAVE! The Left has virtually no power. It sucks today to be a Leftist.
7 posted on
07/11/2017 2:16:30 PM PDT by
vette6387
To: Innovative
They can still go to his page and read his tweet history. Free speech doesn’t equate to a right to be heard. Will they demand his cell number, as well?
To: Innovative
I wonder if the idiots suing block numbers on their cell phones, use a spam filter on their email...?
10 posted on
07/11/2017 2:26:30 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Was ObamaThanks surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
To: Innovative
What times I’ve followed a link to Trumps Twitter acct. a;; I see in the replies are nothing but juvenile,slanderous lies and re-tweeted anti-Trump memes.
A lot of leftwits seem to be getting through just fine.
12 posted on
07/11/2017 2:27:47 PM PDT by
digger48
To: Innovative
Ohhhhh I have a whole list of Democrats that blocked me for speaking the truth.. can I start with Keith Ellenson?
13 posted on
07/11/2017 2:27:52 PM PDT by
cableguymn
(We need a redneck in the white house....)
To: Innovative
Bet these same homofascists have no problem with twitter and facebook throttling down post views
15 posted on
07/11/2017 2:37:05 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
( Mr. Comey, did you engage in or know of ANY OTHER leaks?)
To: Innovative
Can’t any Twitter or Facebook user block whomever they want to block?
To: Innovative
There goes restraining orders.
18 posted on
07/11/2017 2:43:33 PM PDT by
Eddie01
To: Innovative
19 posted on
07/11/2017 2:47:43 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Innovative
Same hypocrite types who protest the right of conservatives to host and give speeches on taxpayer-funded properties, including those bastions of free speech, universities. Even resorting to violence and physical assault to prevent it. But they not only have a right to speak, they think they have a right to force other people to hear them.
21 posted on
07/11/2017 3:37:15 PM PDT by
mrsmel
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn. I hate autocorre)
To: Innovative
Same hypocrite types who protest the right of conservatives to host and give speeches on taxpayer-funded properties, including those bastions of free speech, universities. Even resorting to violence and physical assault to prevent it. But they not only have a right to speak, they think they have a right to force other people to hear them.
22 posted on
07/11/2017 3:37:32 PM PDT by
mrsmel
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn. I hate autocorre)
To: Innovative
Free Speech does not impose a duty to listen
24 posted on
07/11/2017 4:34:29 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning #covfefe)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson