Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA unveils plan to test asteroid defense technique
ClickOrlando.com ^ | July 1, 2017 | Dakin Adone

Posted on 07/01/2017 5:39:58 PM PDT by plain talk

On Friday, the space agency announced plans to redirect the course of a small asteroid approaching Earth, as part of the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART), according to a NASA press release.

The release notes that asteroids hit Earth nearly every day, but most are small enough to burn up in the atmosphere. But the DART project -- a joint effort between NASA and the John Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory in Maryland -- is for the asteroids that are too big to break up -- those that could have severe consequences for the Earth if they hit.

"DART would be NASA's first mission to demonstrate what's known as the kinetic impactor technique -- striking the asteroid to shift its orbit -- to defend against a potential future asteroid impact," said Lindley Johnson, NASA's planetary defense officer in Washington, in the press release.

DART launch set for October 2022

(Excerpt) Read more at clickorlando.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asteroids; nasa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: plain talk

If you see a bright light in the sky and it vears off to the left or right, you will be fine. However, if it just keeps getting bigger..........you have a problem.


21 posted on 07/01/2017 6:38:16 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Is it not too late to appoint a special counsel to investigate Hillary's crimes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

22 posted on 07/01/2017 6:42:09 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Make US Intelligence great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

I’m a huge Niven and Pournelle fan. I’ve been reading both for 40+ years.


23 posted on 07/01/2017 6:43:06 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

24 posted on 07/01/2017 6:45:25 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Make US Intelligence great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

Exactly.

BTW, what exactly has NASA been spending trillions on since its inception?

They have stated they ‘lost’ the technology to go to the moon.

They destroyed the Shuttles.

They have stated that none of the photos they have of Earth from space are real. (none)

They have stated they no longer can get past the Van Allen Belt.

They have stated there is some invisible “barrier” now in space that just happened.

coughtheFirmamentcough

NASA loves the Paris Agreement, Climate Change, a New World Order, Muslims...

Left wing Statists and Elites ripping us off for over fifty years.


25 posted on 07/01/2017 7:05:06 PM PDT by Sontagged (Lord Jesus: please expose, unveil and then frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

Now that really *is* nonsense. By your own logic.

If God wanted man to recover from disease or injury, He would have made man impervious to such. Please stop bandaging your wounds, seeking the services of a doctor or otherwise doing anything to treat any malady you have. God doesn’t want you to do that.

If God wanted man to commmunicate electronically, we would have been created with networking ports already installed. Please log off FR and don’t get on the internet ever again. God doesn’t want you to do that.

If God wanted man to do anything after sundown, He would have given us perfect night vision or made it always day out. Please do not use any sort of illumination or electricity, God doesn’t want you to.

Here’s a hint: The God of the Bible I’ve read helps those who help themselves. Not those that sit around on their arses claiming God will do it all.


26 posted on 07/01/2017 7:16:44 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

There still is!


27 posted on 07/01/2017 7:18:22 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

You need a life.


28 posted on 07/01/2017 7:28:14 PM PDT by Fungi (Mucor roxii is not a rock band.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: plain talk; All; LS
I happened to be at Oshkosh (flyin, maybe about the time Al Gore got on his G.W. bandwagon) at a Burt Rutan forum where he discussed his research as to how and why Global Warming was a crock, my word not his. He also noted why are we not doing something about the bigger threat of asteroid impacts?

One of two things, either Team Trump knows of Burt and has him on speed dial, or they have read my post on this subject before. ;-)

29 posted on 07/01/2017 7:45:23 PM PDT by taildragger (Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Well this is something NASA should be working on ... instead of muslim outreach.

Deflecting one enough to miss Europe and hit mecca works for me...

30 posted on 07/01/2017 8:18:58 PM PDT by null and void (This is how socialists work: Erase the past, Bankrupt the present, Steal from the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer
Do the testing to figure out how to change their orbits on asteroids who’s orbits are now entirely inside ours. Minimize the risk. Once you’ve figured out how to move them then do the additional work to determine how to approach asteroids in potentially dangerous orbits to apply the lessons of the former.

It really isn't that hard to understand. Conservation of momentum still works.

The unknowns are what happens 100-200 and more orbits from now when a close encounter now could become a direct hit then. The big uncertainty comes in that small changes in closest approach now can produce dramatic changes in future orbits.

Actually doing it is a big deal, but understanding how an impactor would work is not that hard.

31 posted on 07/01/2017 11:29:38 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

How much will this cost us?

ML/NJ


32 posted on 07/02/2017 12:24:41 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Compared to the cost of an eventual substantial impact (we know it WILL happen, just not when), it is pretty cheap insurance...


33 posted on 07/02/2017 12:57:40 AM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
If you see a bright light in the sky and it vears off to the left or right, you will be fine. However, if it just keeps getting bigger..........you have a problem.

If you see a bright light in the sky, that means it's entered Earth's atmosphere, and you are close enough to be a witness.

Whether or not you are toast is a question of how big the object is.

34 posted on 07/02/2017 1:12:21 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

This has nothing to do with God destroying the planet. It does have to do with smaller objects that can still cause great damage. Erasing mankind is still an event an order of magnitude (at least) smaller than “destroying the planet”.

Even a lunar size body could be deflected (would take nukes, or possibly directing a smaller asteroid into the larger body) if it could be determined early enough that big boy was on a collision course w/ Earth. (I’d guess we’d want to hit it starting a couple years “out”.) Space is so big that the incoming object only need be deflected a very small amount, if it’s not right on top of you...

Why did God give Man sentience, if not to use it to try to survive the tests he (Nature) throws at us?


35 posted on 07/02/2017 1:21:01 AM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Popman
Doesn’t a drone need an atmosphere to fly in ?

A drone is simply a remotely guided (in real-time or not) vehicle. It can travel in air, space, land, or sea, or possibly a combination of the above.

It only needs an atmosphere if it is an airplane.

If it is a spacecraft, it does not need an atmosphere (in fact, if it accidentally encounters an atmosphere, it will likely be destroyed).

A drone needn't even fly. The Curiosity Mars rover is a drone. It trundles around Mars's surface in slow, deliberate, carefully programmed itineraries (Mars is way too many light-seconds distant to allow for real time control).

There are also sea-going drones. E.g., the Russians are rumored to have developed a drone submarine capable of carrying a nuclear warhead 6200 miles at 56 knots at a depth of 3280 feet.

36 posted on 07/02/2017 1:36:59 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.
pretty cheap insurance

Govt protecting us from every imagined calamity!

ML/NJ

37 posted on 07/02/2017 1:51:01 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Ironically, the test worked and like a billiard ball on a new orbit the tiny rock, now harmless to Earth, struck a very large (2 Km) asteroid, also on a harmless orbit, changing its orbit to a non-deflectable ELE ...


38 posted on 07/02/2017 4:17:27 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
And the orbit will change just enough that, somewhere in its journey around the Sun, it will collide with another rock in space, that it would have missed if left alone, and one or the other (or both) will have their orbits altered to a rock-Earth meeting point.

Can't help but to be a bit ironic when we decide to "play".

39 posted on 07/02/2017 4:34:34 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
now the AF may have another reason to claim their O-4 & above RANK's wear Farts & DARTS on their Saucer Hats
40 posted on 07/02/2017 6:59:30 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson