Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/21/2017 9:24:05 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pining_4_TX

nope


2 posted on 06/21/2017 9:29:06 PM PDT by b4me (If Jesus came to set us free, why are so many professed Believers still in chains?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX

Medicare pays doctors 50 cents for a dollar of service. They would close up shop if this happened.


4 posted on 06/21/2017 9:38:30 PM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX

Less gov. interference in our lives.....not more.


5 posted on 06/21/2017 9:43:59 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX

This is retarded.


6 posted on 06/21/2017 9:50:59 PM PDT by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX

Some folks who signed up for Covered California expecting full or partially subsidized Zerocare, were shifted to the state Medi-cal (Medic-aid) rolls. Many of these folks weren’t qualified for Medi-cal because they exceeded income and/or asset ceilings, but did qualify for Zerocare subsidies.

After the State arbitrarily switched these folks, pre-Medicare age recipients started receiving rather terse form letters saying that the State intended to attach the recipient’s estate for the costs and would chase their estate down in other states’ if the recipient relocated - even insisting California be notified if the recipient moved out of state.

Otoh, I’ve never seen any disclosure from the State that defines what the actual monthly Medi-cal premium liability is to the recipient. In essence, it’s buying blind. Getting switched back to Zerocare has been a mess for many, leaving recipients with concerns there will still be a financial liability against their estates for an unknown sum they shouldn’t have been liable for to begin with since they signed up for Zerocare not welfare. We all know how states are once they decide you owe them money, and I’m not sure how they’re going to handle things once Calif goes single-payer because they’re not saying.

I hope people watch their own states like hawks to make sure that estate impoundment and funny business targeting the assets of pre-Medicare seniors isn’t part of their own state plans because it’s one heck of a trap.


7 posted on 06/21/2017 10:08:58 PM PDT by blueplum ( ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX

As long as we have a federal reserve that can create unlimited debt in a completely printed currency with manipulated interest rates, progressives and Fed.gov can have any social-engineering scheme the can think of


8 posted on 06/21/2017 10:23:35 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX
Uh, no.🤔
9 posted on 06/21/2017 10:39:53 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX

This is hilarious. Any government program that has as one of its requirements “no gaming the system” has already admitted failure. This would quickly become a tax payer financed public to private wealth transfer. Of course this lunatic would then claim but “gaming the system” was against regulations. Haha, hoho, lol, what a tool the author is.


11 posted on 06/21/2017 11:26:18 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX

I’m still stuck on the previous question:

Should government be allowed to provide insurance?

To which my answer is no.

This precludes me from answering the current question.


12 posted on 06/22/2017 3:40:26 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX
I scanned the article. It said nothing about if getting health care insurance would be mandatory. If it weren't mandatory, policies would emerge that would allow people to have the coverage they want, or none at all. Then, it would be up to the insurance companies to do what they do best...convince people to sign up for policies through effective advertising and positive perceptions about coverage.

I'd wager that most people who don't want insurance would sign up for a high deductible policy that only covers catastrophic situations.

13 posted on 06/22/2017 3:48:17 AM PDT by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pining_4_TX
Profoundly stupid. Medicaid enrollees now cannot find doctors to see them, so their "insurance" is useless. This will only get worse. Second, assuming that a medicaid enrollee can find a provider, whee does his reimbursement come from? Same as always-- the taxpayer. IOW nothing new under the sun. Same ol' same ol'.
19 posted on 06/22/2017 9:40:33 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson