Posted on 06/21/2017 6:53:28 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (I) said it is "embarrassing" that President Trump is denying climate change.
"No reputable person or scientist doubts that we are creating an environmental and a climate change problem," Bloomberg told Anderson Cooper late Tuesday on CNN.
"Is it helpful that America pulls out and the President says these things? No, it is not helpful. Is it a disaster for the world? No, it just makes us look foolish,” Bloomberg, the U.N. special envoy for cities and climate change, said.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
He’s more than welcome to give all of his money to climate change “causes” and go live in a third world hut.
If it wasn’t for climate change, Chicago would still be under a mile of ice.
I’m a reputable person.
Bloomberg’s total lack of scientific knowledge is not embarrasing because as a liberal, no one expects him to have any.
Why is he popping out of his hole on this today?
Park your jet and take some time to drink a supersized Coke...
>>”No reputable person or scientist doubts...”<<
Bloomie must have hired a Democrat pollster to come up with this whopper.
Meanwhile, this lying left wing ahole flies to his mansion in Bermuda every weekend in his private jet.
Hey, Bloomturd, why don’t you take an airline flight to Bermuda? They are plenty of flights from New York to Hamilton, Bermuda.
Lying gun-grabber.
I guess nanny bloomberg sees that his democrat party is rudderless without any direction or leadership, other than hate Trump and blame the Russians. So, he’s jumping into the swamp like Holder did the other day.
The Paris Accord was embarrassing. Making us comply and giving other emerging industrial nations 15 years to comply and no enforcement when the time comes is embarrassing.
All it was about was our redistribution of wealth. We would be giving our wealth to undeveloped nations that weren’t using coal.
Every “reputable person or scientist” believes we’re the cause of climate change. What that means is every “reputable person or scientist” who doesn’t believe “We’re creating an environmental problem” is NOT reputable. And they get to decide who’s reputable and who’s not.
Climate change is the same thing as the color of the sky or the presence of water in the oceans. Climate change is and always has been insofar as Earth has had an atmosphere. We cannot do anything to “change” that. Any modifications we manage to make to the climate will be themselves Climate Change.
“or scientist”
Except that many many scientists do indeed doubt the existence of a man-caused climate “problem”. And further, many of them are not only actual climatologists, meteorologists, and physicists, but are leaders in their respective fields.
This is the kind of crap that an honest media would be calling politicians on every time they open their mouths.
“Reputable” meaning “acceptable to people like Algore.”
Hey Bloomy!
Stalin achieved “consensus” the same way.
He made disagreement unsurvivable.
The “scientific method” is the standard for assessing “climate change”.
Assuming you’re clever enough to rely on definitions established centuries before wikipedia....
“Embarrassing” to who? The rich lefties?
I work in NYC and I find Bloomberg very embarrassing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.