Posted on 06/19/2017 8:02:07 AM PDT by COBOL2Java
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday struck down part of a law that bans offensive trademarks in a ruling that is expected to help the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name.
The justices ruled that the 71-year-old trademark law barring disparaging terms infringes free speech rights.
The ruling is a victory for the Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but the case was closely watched for the impact it would have on the separate dispute involving the Washington football team.
Slants founder Simon Tam tried to trademark the band name in 2011, but the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied the request on the ground that it disparages Asians. A federal appeals court in Washington later said the law barring offensive trademarks is unconstitutional.
The Redskins made similar arguments after the trademark office ruled in 2014 that the name offends American Indians and canceled the team’s trademark. A federal appeals court in Richmond put the team’s case on hold while waiting for the Supreme Court to rule in the Slants case.
(Excerpt) Read more at wtop.com ...
Just stopped in a town in Southeasten Colorado, the local high school’s mascot is called the “Savages.”
I laughed when I saw that, because I thought the entire country had gone PC. Not in Lamar, CO I guess.
The Cleveland Spuds.
Almost the exact words I was about to post! My Chinese friend said that rugs are Oriental, people are Asian.
“No constitutional right not to be offended”. Amen.
Where did the fetish come from that says others can not be offended either by speech or trademarks. Oh forgot that PC was purposely created so that elites, politicians and academics are free to decide what we can say, think, and do. Average people seem to have no say in this topic.
Hail to the Redskins! Fight for Ol Dixie!
JetsNation salutes you. Let them be called the Redskins until the end of time.
I went out and purchased Redskins memorabilia based on the idea they’d have to change their name.
It would be great if they didn’t have to.
If I thought they were trying to trash Native Americans, I wouldn’t support it.
To me the team name is a compliment to Native Americans. It’s a sign of respect, nobility, a very strong spirit, and is indicative of a group of winners.
Go Washington Redskins.
Blacks are proud of their skin.
Whites are. Why not redskins?
I think you’d be much more comfortable at a liberal site. That way you can spend your days demanding apologies and explaining how and why liberals are habitually offended.
Are you offended by your own post?
RUSH talked about this court ruling this morning...
Definitely. I committed sui-fend.
YES!
And people can name their teams whatever bloody well pleases them.
Cute. So precious you are.
Rush once spent a lot of time on a team called the Fighting Whities, which the local whites adored.
Indeed. Why not? The only way to really get rid of a slur is to appropriate it for your own use. For example how homosexuals appropriated the terms “queer” and “faggot”.
And indeed we’ll be better off for it. Prohibition of use of a slur only perpetuates it’s existence and its power. Appropriate the term instead as homosexuals have done with the term “queer.”
IC,
whatchu,
dithere.
:: How ‘bout it, Gloria (Alred)? What’s not to like? ::
Maybe a pasty-white, speed-rock band should take on the nomme “GloriaAlred” and see what happens?
:: I spent 19 years in the DC area ::
I think I see YOUR problem here. YOU want to decide...according to your personal-and-assumed offense on behalf of [native] Indians, what should and should-not be acceptable in society.
Reno89519... we [Indians] can defend ourselves and we DO NOT need your “white-bread” support against any perception of bigotry. Can you say, “fascism”? I knew you could.
As I am 1/16 Chippewa (Pottawatomie), I find your arrogance quite insulting to the (native) Indians and tribes of North America [yes, we have no concern with being called “Indians”...just check out our gambling houses!)
We have not appointed YOU to be our protector. We did not ask ^you^ for a blanket consideration and protection from cultural speech patterns.
Serious inquiry
...from whom and where do you assume to “protect” Indians (Aboriginal Americans) from such words?
I say again...y’all white people be funny.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.