Posted on 06/10/2017 8:44:26 AM PDT by rktman
I deny it, absolutely and without question - it is unproven.
In order for AGW to be true, there would have to be a reliable way to distinguish the positive delta since 1800 from ALL OTHER FLUCTUATIONS, positive and negative, that have occurred for millions of years, some of much greater magnitude than the 1800-1997 period.
And, IF AGW were true, then the empirical data from 1997-2017 should follow the theory's predictions, and they do not.
Stories about a lower than normal temperature by far, whispered... accepted as a fluke.
Nice!
“I remember when 100% of scientists agreed there were only 2 genders.”
I remember when all scientists agreed that there were only two SEXES. One hundred percent of English teachers agreed that only words have a gender, not people.
Sick of writers who can’t get to the point.
Not very long ago there was no such thing as a ‘climate scientist.’
97% of Government Funded Scientists Agree to Report Whatever the Government Pays Them Report.
Someday, hopefully soon, we will begin to read this headline: Many Nations Are Starving the Earth’s Ecosystem of Vital Nutrient. CO2 is PLANT FOOD!
In 2006 he said, in as little as ten years it will be too late to stop the consequences of global warming.
(paraphrased)
Excellent observations. We didn’t even have the equipment to do long term observations in the boonies till the advent of the satellite and guess wwhat — instead of adjusting to the satellites we adjust the satellite dara to the artifact plagued weather stations! So called climate science that does this should be hanged in effigy.
How many peer reviewed grants for studies disputing accepted conclusions were awarded?
I’ve taken to referring to it as ‘political climate change’.
Yep - it's important to know when dealing with the liberal leadership, they know they are lying, it's a strategy, so don't expect them to say 'oh, gee, you caught us, ok, we'll adjust our position to match reality.'
It's a known made up story by them to give them access to certain powers, an excuse to step in and control - whether it's energy, climate, healthcare. They know this, we know this, the conservative leadership knows this ... the only people who don't know are their very silly voters, including the most intellectual of their voters, who believe they are so smart that they need not examine their positions. (I know this because I'm from Boston/Cambridge - lived amongst these useful tools for a couple decades)
You'd have more luck using an overcooked spaghetti noodle to bang a nail into concrete than use logic and reality to change the view of an indoctrinated and hypnotized liberal. Let them be, unless you've explicitly and consciously chosen to toy with one - only engage for fun. If the time comes that it's necessary to actually change them ... well, think of the zombie movies and shows - that's pretty much all that will stop them.
Yes and no.
Duplicity, like fake news, the stepsister of propaganda, has been with us for many decades, now...
Silly me, I thought it had been laid to rest; settled.
First of all that figure represents both actual, real, mature climate scientists but mostly self-styled "scientists" and weather "talking heads" (even hairdressers) and graduate students.
Second, That figure represents 97% of 5%, a minuscule number.
Third, the ultimate venue, the Federal Manual of Evidence in a Federal Court for contentious technical topics, created for exactly this sort of technologic, modern issue requiring expertise and relevant experience in a difficult existential field has yet to take place. Even after half a century of pointless and emotional legal foodfights.
Insisting that that happen, sooner rather than later, would decisively actually lay the matter to rest once and for all, and the nation can get to addressing the actual real social and political problems plaguing the Republic.
Of course, the swamp is alive and well and, for them, it is literally a matter of (financial and powerwielding) life or death.
Bump
That's because nobody will demand government control over private industry because of a golf course. :)
*** “I remember when 100% of scientists agreed there were only 2 genders” ***
I just Stole that
*** “You need to make that brilliant sarcasm your tagline” ***
Hope not, cause I stole it a few minutes ago, I could give it back or ... a cookie?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
