Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter Calls on Trump to Impose Temporary Ban on All Immigration
Breitbart ^ | 6/6/2017

Posted on 06/07/2017 5:54:34 AM PDT by Altura Ct.

Video @ link:

Monday on Fox Business Network’s “Varney & Co.,” conservative commentator Ann Coulter, author of “In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome!” suggested rather than impose a ban on people from certain countries, President Donald Trump should enact a temporary ban on all immigration to the United States.

Coulter said if everyone were banned, that would eliminate the religious aspects that are preventing Trump from enacting his policy on immigration.

“I mean, what Trump, for example, suggested in his immigration policy paper, the greatest document since the Magna Carta, was a temporary ban on all immigration,” Coulter said. “You have no religious problem then. Why doesn’t he go back to that? It’s both more aggressive – be very careful. Let in a few a year. We’re letting in 2 million people a year – illegal, legal, guest workers. Probably more than 2 million. And The New York Times writes, ‘Well, it’s just impossible to vet that many people coming in.’ Well, don’t let in that many people then. It’s not that hard.”

“And as for the detention, I would say yes, there are ways to be aggressive,” she continued. “I’d think in some ways I’d be more aggressive. But I don’t think it would raise as many hackles because it looks nothing like an internment. I mean, Europe as an easier time than we do. They don’t have a First Amendment. In Germany, it’s a crime to support the Nazi Party. Are you worried about the Nazis today? No, but we are worried about ISIS. We are worried about Islamic terrorism. It ought to be a crime not merely to communicate, but to advocate that ideology and they ought to be thrown out of the country."

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Little Ray
If an immigrant doesn’t bring talent, training, or capital with him, we shouldn’t admit him.

Talent has nothing to do with it. We have enough talented people.

21 posted on 06/07/2017 6:30:17 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Define “immigration”? Most of the 9/11 hijackers entered the U.S. on tourist visas. Do we halt tourists? Are people here on student visas or H-1B visas considered immigrants and will be halted? Or is she just talking about people wanting to move here permanently, and if so then that is less than a partial solution.


22 posted on 06/07/2017 6:31:00 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940
After we stop letting people in, we can move on to not letting people out.

What did you mean by this?

23 posted on 06/07/2017 6:31:16 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
It's not that hard to figure out: The Immigrant Visa Process
24 posted on 06/07/2017 6:33:21 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The Toll
After we stop letting people in, maybe we will become an actual WE again.

Like those other times we were so afraid we stopped immigration?

When was that, exactly?

25 posted on 06/07/2017 6:34:40 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sagar
Sirhan Sirhan family was Christian Arab.

He was a Jordanian "Palestinian" and a terrorist too.


26 posted on 06/07/2017 6:36:06 AM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best Long Term Prepper Tactic: Beat The Muslim Demographic Tsnami - Have Big Families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940
After we stop letting people in, we can move on to not letting people out.

Don't give them any ideas...

27 posted on 06/07/2017 6:36:24 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

The Mouse wouldn’t like that much.


28 posted on 06/07/2017 6:36:32 AM PDT by The Dude Abides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940

“After we stop letting people in, we can move on to not letting people out.”

That’s crap.


29 posted on 06/07/2017 6:37:30 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Common sense would suggest that a total ban on immigration is the way to go. The ban should last as long as it takes to get our current problems with immigration solved which would include a border wall built, processing/disposal of illegal immigrants already here and an effective system in place for future immigration purposes. And, now and forever, don’t allow any muslims into our country.


30 posted on 06/07/2017 6:37:32 AM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

No. Only m*slims.


31 posted on 06/07/2017 6:38:28 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Le Pen: "Islamism is a totalitarian ideology that has declared war on our nation, on civilization.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
Immigration Act of 1924

During the Harding administration, a stop-gap immigration measure was passed by Congress in 1921 for the purpose of slowing the flood of immigrants entering the United States.

A more thorough law was signed by President Coolidge in May 1924. It provided for the following:

The quota for immigrants entering the U.S. was set at two percent of the total of any given nation`s residents in the U.S. as reported in the 1890 census;

after July 1, 1927, the two percent rule was to be replaced by an overall cap of 150,000 immigrants annually and quotas determined by "national origins" as revealed in the 1920 census.

32 posted on 06/07/2017 6:39:50 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Fear and common sense are not the same thing. I don’t care that we have never done it before. We’ve never had a political party intent on using immigration to capture single party rule before either.


33 posted on 06/07/2017 6:43:44 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

We’ve it before. I think it was around 1919-1924. We did not allow anyone to come here, from anywhere.


34 posted on 06/07/2017 6:44:48 AM PDT by tillacum (I'm still a Deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Exactly. They can’t scream “Islamophobia” or whatever if EVERYBODY is banned. In the past, (the 1920s to the 1960s) when this country greatly limited immigration, that’s when we became a wonderful place. Everybody looks back to the “good old days” when we put men on the moon and nobody had to lock their doors. But what we’re not allowed to say is that that was before the immigration floodgates were opened.

No one has a God-given right to come here.


35 posted on 06/07/2017 6:52:53 AM PDT by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

For at least three years. Maybe five.

5.56mm


36 posted on 06/07/2017 6:55:24 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
The quota for immigrants entering the U.S. was set at two percent of the total of any given nation`s residents in the U.S. as reported in the 1890 census;

This didn't limit total immigration but capped the number from certain countries.

Got a relevant example?

37 posted on 06/07/2017 6:58:51 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tillacum

Immigration was ratcheted down most in the ‘30s, ‘40s, and early ‘50s. Sometimes the years ‘25 through ‘65 are called ‘The Great Pause’ in immigration.

The early ‘20s saw a reduction in the massive immigration of previous decades, but didn’t stop it by any stretch. What happened then was an attempt to exclude Easter and Southern Europeans and Jews.

That era, BTW, was the beginning of Jews’ devotion to Democrats. World War I and its aftermath were disastrous for Jews, and the US under Republicans was closing as a refuge for them.


38 posted on 06/07/2017 7:07:53 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
after July 1, 1927, the two percent rule was to be replaced by an overall cap of 150,000 immigrants annually and quotas determined by "national origins" as revealed in the 1920 census.
39 posted on 06/07/2017 7:10:03 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
Brilliant.

Most immigrants are socialists from 3rd world hell holes and Muslims . This is thanks to Ted Kennedy and his 1965 immigration act. repeal that too.

40 posted on 06/07/2017 7:10:18 AM PDT by Democrat_media (Trump saved America from Hillary(socialism) risking it all to save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson