Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/06/2017 5:43:00 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: reaganaut1

If that undermines anything, the justices are fools.


2 posted on 06/06/2017 5:46:30 AM PDT by jimfree (My16 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Sessions is a little slow on the take up. DOJ is in need of a leader.


3 posted on 06/06/2017 5:47:24 AM PDT by Souled_Out (Our hope is in the power of God working through the hearts of people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Same crap as his Mexico comments when he opened his campaign. He speaks plainly and the fake journalists at WSJ cannot handle that language.

Girls.


5 posted on 06/06/2017 5:53:32 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

#MAGA

KEK


6 posted on 06/06/2017 5:56:17 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Now that the travel ban is going to the SC he can say anything; there will be enough judges that will follow the Constitution.


7 posted on 06/06/2017 5:56:47 AM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

He called it a travel ban. They had accused him of calling it a muslim ban.

Now they are all repeating that it is a travel ban.

Are they really that stupid?


10 posted on 06/06/2017 5:58:19 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

They really go out of their way to avoid using the adjective “President”.

Did they ever call Larry Sinclair’s boyfriend, Mister Obama?


11 posted on 06/06/2017 5:58:28 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

If Trump had followed the advice of the WSJ editorial board Hillary would be president.

The Supreme Court doesn’t get swayed by tweets.


13 posted on 06/06/2017 6:00:17 AM PDT by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Translation: “Mr. Trump, you’re not one of us. This is not your playground. You don’t think like us you don’t talk like us. You can’t play with us. We don’t like you.”


15 posted on 06/06/2017 6:03:17 AM PDT by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The travel ban and all associated with it is not the issue. The Supreme Court will determine if President Trump has the right to enforce his Constitutional/Congressional mandated immigration powers.


19 posted on 06/06/2017 6:05:30 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The Justices are required to follow the law - not to have feelings about a President’s tweets.


24 posted on 06/06/2017 6:10:59 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

There is nothing in his statement that contradicts the current executive order or that should in any way offend any Court accept a totally prejudiced leftist judge.


25 posted on 06/06/2017 6:11:10 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
...the travel ban might not have become a political bonfire

The travel ban became a political bonfire because of activist Democrat judges and the Anti-American Big Media. And now we add to that a bunch of hand wringing politically correct RINOs who are afraid of their own shadow whining about Trump.

The so-called travel ban is what it is. It's a Constitutional EO that temporarily stops immigration from countries that we can't vet.

Period!

27 posted on 06/06/2017 6:12:22 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Why should the executive tiptoe around the Judiciary as if he was a personal injury plaintiff looking for a little money?


28 posted on 06/06/2017 6:12:45 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The travel bans were 90 days to allow for us to implement “extreme vetting”. Even without the implementation, more than 90 days have passed. Don’t we have “extreme vetting” ready regardless?


36 posted on 06/06/2017 6:25:24 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Yesterdays Tweeter Page of Maggie Haberman.

Trump twitter slap at Justice Department over travel ban reflects growing frustration with Sessions. @maggieNYT

Maggie Haberman- From the "wiretapp" tweet to Comey dismissal, Trump frustration w Sessions looms large @peterbakernyt and me

Most of Trump's miserable portions of last two months trace back to one thing - the Sessions recusal re Russia

This White House a tough place to work: Trump souring on Jeff Sessions. Says who? Says @maggienyt and @peterbakernyt-NYT-

Mike Kruse-Politico- “There’s no doubt that keeping members focused on investigations detracts from our legislative agenda.”

Maggie Haberman- It isn't just the investigations. It's also the seeming inability of POTUS to stay focused.

Maggie Haberman- Random woman, New Yorker, White House correspondent for NYTimes, analyst CNN. RTs don't imply agreement. maggie.haberman@nytimes.com****************************

Maggie Haberman YESTERDAY tweets were HIT SESSIONS HARD and keep hitting the agenda that our President is unhappy with Sessions. It was 24/7 and as much as we might overlook this Piece of C#AP she does set the agenda for ALL the other main stream news sources. Its like she gets her orders and they ALL fall in line to her agenda. I've been following her for over two years on the Trump Train.


37 posted on 06/06/2017 6:26:54 AM PDT by STARLIT (Draining the Swamp includes Cleaning Out The Sewer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The Justices are required to follow the law - not to have feelings about a President’s tweets.


38 posted on 06/06/2017 6:28:14 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Fine. All planes routed to the United States carrying Nationals from the 6 listed countries will be escorted by F16 to a landing strip in the Azores where it will remain until said passengers are returned.

Tell the courts to stop that!


40 posted on 06/06/2017 6:29:24 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

NON Sense. FAKE NEWS


42 posted on 06/06/2017 6:30:21 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

President Trump thinks he is going to win in the SC. He wants a “travel ban” upheld not some pablum.


76 posted on 06/06/2017 7:48:27 AM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson