Posted on 06/02/2017 3:54:58 AM PDT by Petrosius
TORONTO, June 1, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) Ontarios Kathleen Wynne Liberals have passed what critics describe as totalitarian Bill 89 by a vote of 63 to 23 on the last day before Queens Park adjourns for the summer.
Pro-family advocates warn Bill 89 gives the state more power to seize children from families that oppose the LGBTQI and gender ideology agenda, and allows government agencies to effectively ban couples who disagree with that agenda from fostering or adopting children.
Bill 89, or the Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act, 2017, repeals and replaces the former Child and Family Services Act that governs child protection services, and adoption and foster care services.
It adds gender identity and gender expression as factors to be considered in the best interests of the child.
At the same time, it deletes the religious faith in which the parents are raising the child as a factor to be considered, and mandates child protection services consider only the childs own creed or religion when assessing the best interests of the child.
With the passage of Bill 89, weve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canadas history, says Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition.
Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.
Disappointed as I am with this result, I am not surprised, commented Tanya Granic Allen, president of Parents As First Educators (PAFE). The Kathleen Wynne Liberals have for years been pursuing their anti-parent and anti-family agenda and Bill 89 is the latest installment.
Conservative MPPs present at Queens Park for the vote opposed the bill, which was in stark contrast to their position at second reading in March, when 83 of Ontarios 107 MPPs passed Bill 89 unanimously.
The Conservatives who voted June 1 against Bill 89 included Monte McNaughton, Jeff Yurek, Bob Bailey, Gila Martow, Todd Smith, Michael Harris, and Steve Clark.
PC leader Patrick Brown was not in the house for the vote.
Trillium Party MPP Jack MacLaren also voted against the bill.
A source present at a Tory caucus meeting two weeks ago told LifeSiteNews the Conservative members were swayed by three or four MPPs who said they could not in conscience vote for what the source described as a bill that is fundamentally and morally wrong.
The PC caucus, now at 28 members, thereupon decided to vote as a block against Bill 89, according to the source.
Fonseca lauded those PC MPPs who came to their senses, stopped listening to that propagandist for Kathleen Wynnes policies, and I do mean Patrick Brown, and chose to finally vote against tyranny.
And thank God they did, because it serves as a symbol of resistance, he said.
CLC had been directly lobbying MPPs to oppose the bill, and we believe that may have been a factor in why the PCs ended up voting en masse against it.
Parents As First Educators and the Association for Reformed Political Action (ARPA) have also been at the forefront of relentless lobbying against the bill.
But despite these efforts, no Liberal broke ranks to vote on behalf of concerned parents, and a number of NPD MPPs voted for the bill as well.
Bill 89 retains the provision in current law that a child who is suffering or at risk of suffering mental or emotional harm and whose parents do not provide treatment or access to treatment is in need of protection under the law.
But while the former law said the Childrens Aid Society should take the least disruptive course of action, Bill 89 adds including the provision of prevention services, early intervention services and community support services," according to an ARPA analysis.
The implication is that intervention should not be presumed to be more disruptive than non-intervention, the ARPA report adds.
Statements by Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau clearly signaled the pro-LGBTQ, gender ideology Liberal agenda, critics warned.
Coteau, who introduced the bill, told QP Briefing he sees questioning teenagers self-identification as LGBTQI or telling them to change as abuse.
I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently, he said.
If its abuse, and if its within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.
Childrens Aid agencies now have a type of police power to bust down your door, and seize your biological children if you are known to oppose LGBT ideology and the fraudulent theory of gender identity', if for instance, some claim is made that your child may be same-sex attracted or confused about their gender, according to Fonseca.
We already see similar tyranny happening in other jurisdictions, such as Norway, where the main child protection service there, Barnevernet, has been involved in numerous high profile seizures of children from traditionally-principled families, he added.
Fonseca pointed out the Liberal bill gives legal cover for government workers to discriminate against Christians who want to adopt or foster children.
Even before Bill 89 was passed, but immediately after its introduction in December, I learned of several Christian couples who were turned down for adoption on account of their deeply held religious beliefs about traditional marriage and human sexuality, he told LifeSiteNews.
This reveals the stunning hypocrisy and anti-Christian bigotry of the left, Fonseca said.
The Ontario court in 1995 ruled for the first time in Canadian history that it was discriminatory of the Child and Family Services Act to not allow homosexual couples to bring a joint application for adoption.
But the same activists who cried discrimination in 1995 [are] now actively legislating the same discrimination upon Bible-believing Christians, by banning them from having children through adoption, Fonseca said.
Will the left never feel ashamed of its hypocrisy?
Fonseca also issued a plea to Christian leaders, particularly the Catholic bishops.
Why has the most powerful spiritual body in this province, the Catholic hierarchy, not lifted a finger nor raised a voice to oppose this tyranny against Christian families, and those from other faiths? Fonseca questioned.
The lack of spiritual leadership is killing us. Every single time that Liberals, either federally or provincially, roll out the LGBT juggernaut to take away our rights, or to demonize us as bigots, we hear nothing but silence from the Church. This has to stop.
Wanna know why the first thing wannabe Fascists do is disarm the citizenry? Crap like this, that’s why.
They would have to step over their colleagues’ dead bodies to do this crap....
Maybe soon they will not need begging!
Ah, even before the guns go the churches. You can’t even lament sex perversion in public anymore.
Ah, even before the guns go the churches. You can’t even lament sex perversion in public anymore.
Well, at least officially. Where there is the will of God and willing people there is a way.
/// The fact that the Christian champions talk this way is evidence of the spiritually weak position they are in. This is Mohammed like talk, not St. Paul like talk. ///
I consider Christian values to be overall superior to Islamic values and secular liberal values, but I’m not a Christian myself.
I don’t believe in Satan, for example, but if it turned out he existed, I’m wouldn’t bend over and plant a big wet kiss on his butt or the butts of his followers.
I’d fight, and win, lose or draw, they’d know they were in a fight.
Bet the law ignores Muslims.
The lack of spiritual leadership is killing us. Every single time that Liberals, either federally or provincially, roll out the LGBT juggernaut to take away our rights, or to demonize us as bigots, we hear nothing but silence from the Church. This has to stop.
Given reports on the liberal agenda currently being implemented by Pope Francis, is it really any surprise why the provincial Catholic Church leadership remains silent?
The root question, as in the case of liberal silence in the face of FGM and Sharia, is whether or not their inaction arises out of tacit agreement or fear.
Well this is a Christian fight. If Christians are not to kiss up to Satan they must lovingly embrace God.
“Could it be that the Pope is more concerned about global warming theories?”
Popie, like the Fraud, is interested in and supportive of ANYTHING that weakens or destroys western traditional Christian civilization and America.
It’s who he is, how he was raised, and what he does.
And there are remnants of state church culture left in Christendom... The 3rd century mistake. The state will dumb down church grasp of God to something merely academic right quick.
Progressivism breeds scum and villains.
At least they can take up arms and defend themselves.
Oh, wait a minute, that’s right...nevermind.
Fidel’s hell-spawn I suspect,
The Pope is a Marxist. Easy answer.
And this is just another reason that a free country must have a written and enforced constitution. Otherwise the government is all powerful and tyranny follows quickly.
Meanwhile on the next street over, the Islamic rapeugee invading hordes are teaching their 7 year olds how to strap on suicide vests,
This is a law that you do not allow to be enforced.
You have no choice but to do whatever it takes to stop the true nazis.
amen
This does not just impact adoptive parents. This impacts the rights of natural parents.
Under this law, if I have a child that is sexually confused, I would have to support that child continuing down the wrong path rather than being able to obtain treatment to correct this confusion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.