>>I’m not too sure that the resource officer wasn’t talking
out of his ass when he mentioned a child porn charge
to the under 18 kid. Either way he should let
real law enforcement handle that aspect.
He wasn’t. That’s a real thing.
Sure, child porn is illegal and needs to be prosecuted.
However, a 16 year old boy with a phone video of his
G-friend and him having sex certainly begs for some
legal sanctions but it won’t be prosecuted or treated
the same as a 32 year old pervert sharing pix of naked
pre-teen girls and IF that is what the resource officer
intentionally led the kid to believe then he needs some
more training.