Sure, child porn is illegal and needs to be prosecuted.
However, a 16 year old boy with a phone video of his
G-friend and him having sex certainly begs for some
legal sanctions but it won’t be prosecuted or treated
the same as a 32 year old pervert sharing pix of naked
pre-teen girls and IF that is what the resource officer
intentionally led the kid to believe then he needs some
more training.
>>Sure, child porn is illegal and needs to be prosecuted.
However, a 16 year old boy with a phone video of his
G-friend and him having sex certainly begs for some
legal sanctions but it won’t be prosecuted or treated
the same as a 32 year old pervert sharing pix of naked
pre-teen girls and IF that is what the resource officer
intentionally led the kid to believe then he needs some
more training.
I agree. He wouldn’t have been punished as severely as a 32 yr old man. But, he would still be branded a sex offender for life even if he only got probation, with all the restrictions that label carries.