Hacker Kim Dotcom: “I Knew Seth Rich Was the Wikileaks Source – I Was Involved”

Gateway Pundit ^ | May 20, 2017 | Jim Hoft

[stylin19a]

maybe he has a dead man’s switch

[ConservativeMind]

I read that Podesta’s emails were accessed through the sniffing of insecure VPN sessions on Amtrak over many days.

He probably connected to a spoof Wi-Fi site someone has set up to lure people.

[DoughtyOne]

FReepers, it's time to get serious about retiring this FReep-a-thon.


Free Republic, the Home of the Eternal FReeper, Conservatism's Finest  (timely thoughts on the FReeper dynamic and Free Republic)

Ramirez political cartoon: Try it! LARGE VERSION 05/08/2017: LINK  LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).

Please join the monthlies, an automated way to help support Free Republic.

If you are not opting to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  LINK

FReepers, 52.71% of the Second Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.  Click above and pencil in your donation now.  Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!
...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

[Carthego delenda est]

“There is more evidence that Seth Rich was the leaker and was murdered for it than the Russians hacked the DNC and were involved with Trump.”

BTT!

That statement sums it up perfectly. The whole “Russian hacking of the election” seems to have originally been created with the expectation that Hillary would be elected, to use as an excuse to implement some sort of plans for conflict/war needed to advance the Globalist agenda. When she wasn’t elected, they just modified it to a “Russian-Trump connection” in the hopes of either removing him from office (at best), or to otherwise create a quagmire, bogging down his administration and his stated goals. A form of damage control until another Uniparty-Globalist-Deep State player is back in the White House.

Seth Rich got a glimpse of how corrupt the DNC and Clinton really are, and decided to act upon that info by attempting to go public with it. For such, he needed to be “made an example of” (Podesta) to show happens to those who dare to betray the Deep State.

[Eleutheria5]

On the contrary. His life insurance premium went down, because he went public. This makes it harder to keep his putative death quiet.

[ScottinVA]

Until this guy produces solid evidence, he ought not be considered anything more than a Jerome Corsi-type attention seeker.

[KSCITYBOY]

btt

[wiseprince]

Oh look, someone on the internet wants attention!

[Enlightened1]

Nice post!

[Moleman]

Will any of this get a mention in the MSM? Maybe Fox?

[Hot Tabasco]

Without material evidence of this guy’s claims, he is a whistler in a wind storm. ZZZzzzz.

Are you familiar with this guy's history? He IS a known hacker who is living in NZ fighting exportation to the US for charges leveled against him by the feds for copyright infringement.

And if you've been following this Russian hacker crap then you would know that Wikileaks stated emphatically months ago that the Russians were not involved..........

ZZZZZZZ

[Hot Tabasco]

There needs to be something more verifiable

What do you suggest? Would it be a written statement by Wikileaks themselves that the Russians were not the source of the emails they released?........oh wait

[RitaOK]

No, I didn’t know this guy’s history. I hope he can cough up the goods on his claims, forthwith.

Meanwhile, we got nothing. We have one guy running directly to the media, announcing to the world (as best he can), of his “Big Get”.

It consumes a lot of anger energy to lather up for something that is unconfirmed by any official of much rank and a rung beyond hearsay, as from the Justice Department, CIA, etc.

It seems to me that Sessions could be released from his recusal, since this version would become more about a domestic influence on the election and unrelated to the “Russia investigation”, for which Sessions recusal was singularly applied.