Posted on 05/12/2017 1:18:37 PM PDT by Kaslin
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) just loves this. She’s back, folks. After calling the president a “disgusting, poor excuse for a man,” saying Trump had no business being president, and that she would fight for his impeachment every day, Waters has been having a field day post-Comey firing. Keep in mind, she has said that it would have been fine for Hillary Clinton to fire the FBI director, but not Trump. So, she’s upset that Mr. Comey was fired after saying he’s lost all credibility, but also outraged that Trump fired him. She’s probably the most explicit example of Democratic hypocrisy on this matter. Now, she feels that the president has committed obstruction of justice with Mr. Comey’s dismissal, an impeachable offense (NTK Network):
Maxine Watters This President Needs To Be Impeached
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) yet again called for President Trump to be impeached during an interview on MSNBC, Thursday night.MSNBC’s Chris Hayes started the interview by asking Waters if she agreed with President Trump’s statement that former FBI Director James Comey was a showboat and a grandstander.
“As you know, I did say that he had no credibility, and I still say coming out of that classified briefing, that I had come to the conclusion he didn’t have credibility,” Waters told Hayes.
Waters went on to tell Hayes that the comparison between what Democrats previously said and what they are saying now regarding Comey isn’t hypocritical because President Trump fired Comey, while the former FBI Director was investigating the Trump campaign.
Hayes followed up by asking Waters what she would being doing right now if she was Speaker of House.
“Well absolutely, I think [Trump] can be looked at and perhaps even charged with obstruction of justice,” Waters told Hayes.
Hayes asked Waters if she meant impeachment proceedings.
“You know, I’ve said all along that he would lead us to impeachment, and he’s doing just that. Everyday, more and more is unfolding,” Waters told Hayes.
Oh, and let’s not forget that Ms. Waters said that outgoing Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) might have Russian ties on Hayes’ show without even mentioning a shred of evidence. So, it’s just a friendly reminder that she’s tossed out tin foil hat insanity before. All the more reason why we need to make her the face of the Democratic Party.
The ‘woman’ needs a cool splash in the face. Quick - stick her head in the toilet and flush!
The left is perpetrating a criminal conspiracy.
What I hear Maxine Waters saying is, “Please bring several million gun-toting, freedom-loving, Trump supporters to Washington, storm Congress, and take out the trash... add my name to your list of trash... and Trump must extend blanket pardons to such a mob in order to return the rule of law.”
We put up with 8 years of lawless, unconstitutional tyranny from Obama. He illegally armed drug dealers who used those guns to kill border patrol agents. He and Hillary teamed up to arm Muslim radicals, including ISIS, in the Middle East. They murdered and tortured Christians in Egypt, Iraq, and Syria.
This is not to mention the crimes against humanity (abortion and selling baby body parts), and crimes against nature (homosexual marriage) that the left has imposed on free society.
Waters, Obama, and the Clintons ought to be chopped up, fed to pigs, and have the pigs and their feces air dropped, along with a large bomb, on Mecca—the breeding place of Islamic terrorism.
The inmates have been running the asylum long enough. Sane people are fed up and they’re about to put an end to it.
Then, I realized that it was a picture of the seditious moroness from Caliwhackistan.
"Maxie Depends" makes inbreds look smart...
Wonder where she would be now if ths wre stil in efect and not repealed in 1994?
rom the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[Laws in effect as of January 3, 2005]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
January 3, 2005 and July 7, 2006]
[CITE: 18USC2388]
TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I—CRIMES
CHAPTER 115—TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
Sec. 2388. Activities affecting armed forces during war
(a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or
conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with
the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United
States or to promote the success of its enemies; or
Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or
attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of
duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully
obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to
the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty
years, or both.
(b) If two or more persons conspire to violate subsection (a) of
this section and one or more such persons do any act to effect the
object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall
be punished as provided in said subsection (a).
(c) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has
reasonable grounds to believe or suspect, has committed, or is about to
commit, an offense under this section, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(d) This section shall apply within the admiralty and maritime
jurisdiction of the United States, and on the high seas, as well as
within the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 811; Pub. L. 103-322, title XXXIII,
Sec. 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on sections 33, 34, 35, 37 of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War
and National Defense (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title I, Secs. 3, 4, 5, 8,
40 Stat. 219; Mar. 3, 1921, ch. 136, 41 Stat. 1359; Mar. 28, 1940, ch.
72, Sec. 2, 54 Stat. 79).
Sections 33, 34, 35, and 37 of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War and
National Defense, were consolidated. Sections 34, 35, and 37 of title
50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War and National Defense, are also incorporated in
sections 791, 792, and 794 of this title, to which they relate.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103-322 substituted ``fined under this title’’ for
``fined not more than $10,000’’ in last par. of subsec. (a) and in
subsec. (c).
Repeals
Section 7 of act June 30, 1953, ch. 175, 67 Stat. 134, repealed
Joint Res. July 3, 1952, ch. 570, Sec. 1(a)(29), 66 Stat. 333; Joint
Res. Mar. 31, 1953, ch. 13, Sec. 1, 67 Stat. 18, which had provided that
this section should continue in force until six months after the
termination of the National emergency proclaimed by 1950 Proc. No. 2914
which is set out as a note preceding section 1 of Appendix to Title 50,
War and National Defense.
Repeal of Extensions of War-time Provisions
Section 6 of Joint Res. July 3, 1952, repealed Joint Res. Apr. 14,
1952, ch. 204, 66 Stat. 54, as amended by Joint Res. May 28, 1952, ch.
339, 66 Stat. 96. Intermediate extensions by Joint Res. June 14, 1952,
ch. 437, 66 Stat. 137, and Joint Res. June 30, 1952, ch. 526, 66 Stat.
296, which continued provisions until July 3, 1952, expired by their own
terms.
I suspect she represents her constituents very well.
May 10, 2017
4:01 pm
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) said that she would have supported Hillary Clinton if she decided to fire James Comey but did not support President Trump’s decision. Waters’ reasoning made little sense to MSNBC’s Peter Alexander, who had to ask Waters for clarification multiple times during an interview on MSNBC.
MSNBC played a clip from earlier this year when Waters said FBI Director Comey “has no credibility” following a closed-door session with him.
MSNBC’s Peter Alexander asked Waters if she supports President Trump’s decision to fire Comey, given that Waters had previously said she has no faith in Comey.
“No, I do not necessarily support the president’s decision,” Waters told Alexander, citing President Trump’s praise for how Comey handled the investigation into Clinton’s emails.
“But congresswoman, I understand in the past he was praising him, but if you said that FBI Director James Comey had no credibility, wouldn’t you support the fact that the president … made the decision to get rid of him?” Alexander asked Waters.
Waters told Alexander that is not the case, because FBI Director Comey was investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, which Waters believes will lead to Trump’s impeachment.
Alexander followed up by asking Waters if she thinks it would have been better to leave in place the FBI director, who Waters had previously said had no credibility, to conduct such an investigation.
Waters dodged the question, redirecting the conversation to how President Trump had said earlier he had confidence in Comey.
“But you said [Comey] had no credibility, so it would make sense that [Trump] get rid of him,” Alexander pressed Waters.
“No,” Waters responded, telling Alexander that President Trump’s firing of Comey amounted to interference in an ongoing investigation.
Alexander then asked Waters if she thinks an FBI director with credibility would have been in a better position to pursue this investigation into Trump’s campaign.
“I think if the president had fired him when he first came in, he would not have to be in a position now where he is trying to make up a story about why. It does not meet the smell test,” Waters told Alexander.
Alexander then asked Waters if she would have recommended that Hillary Clinton fire James Comey, had Clinton won the election.
“Well, let me tell you something. If [Clinton] had won the White House, I believe that given what [Comey] did to her, and what he tried to do, she should have fired him. Yes,” Waters responded forcefully.
“So [Clinton] should have fired [Comey], but [Trump] shouldn’t have fired [Comey]?” Alexander asked Waters. “This is why I’m confused.”
“You’re not confused,” Waters responded.
Alexander said that he is confused, before Waters proceeded to give another confusing answer.
http://ntknetwork.com/nbc-reporter-takes-maxine-waters-to-task-on-comey-hypocrisy/
Our family dog that died and was buried 3 decades ago, has a higher IQ as a dead dog, than Maxine does as a living PC example.
GOOF#1 what a one sided joke!!!she is racist....
GOOF#1 what a one sided joke!!!she is racist....
Cannot help it, she has the zaklies disease, you know, when asking her doctor why she could not get any dates her doc told her she had the Zaklies. She asked is that bad. He said why yes it is but it is not fatal. She pestered for a definition of the disease and the doc said well, I detect an extreme case of the Zaklies: it is when your butt looks like your face.
Maxine was the subject of an ethics probe for her role in enriching herself through bank legislation, but it just sort of evaporated like so many other scandals.
This ignorant foul black hag never quits showing what a fool she is.
She cares about no laws. Stupid and dangerous person.
It’s too bad members of Congress don’t have to prove they have an IQ of at least 80 before being allowed to take office. I wish she’d go back to rambling incoherently about Russia’s invasion of “Korea” instead of constantly attacking our president with imbecilic nonsense.
Wiggers?
Maxine should be charged as terminally ugly and stupid.....
Conviction would be easy....
SWP
Maxine Waters should be charged with impersonating a human being also.
So he fired a guy you wanted fired. Now he is leading you to impeachment. Wut?
See: “Corrine Brown convicted on 18 of 22 federal embezzlement charges for a charity”.
Sistah Corrine and Waters are quite close— or were. Corrine’s up for sentencing— and maybe she will spill on Maxi baby. Maxi is a far bigger crook, esp the bank shenanigans with her husband’s bank.
This is why she is howling, and running like mad. All the marbles, game changing cleaning of the Augean stables.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.