Posted on 05/06/2017 5:36:47 AM PDT by Kaslin
It has been six months since the political world was rocked to its core with the upset election of Donald Trump as President. One person who has not gotten over Trump’s victory is his opponent, Hillary Clinton.
Of course, in the days before the election, almost every pollster and commentator predicted a Clinton victory. She was overconfident and believed the media spin. Incredibly, she was outperformed by a political novice, who won 306 electoral votes in 31 states, an unexpected landslide.
This week, in an interview with Christiane Amanpour of CNN, Clinton blamed the loss on “the combination of Jim Comey's letter on October 28 and Russian WikiLeaks.”
Obviously, Hillary Clinton prefers fantasy to the harsh political reality of her disastrous campaign. She said, "I was on the way to winning” until these supposedly disastrous circumstances united to derail her candidacy. It is quite convenient for Hillary to blame everyone else but herself.
Hillary claimed that Comey’s letter and WikiLeaks disclosures were critical factors that “raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me but got scared off," For good measure, she also blamed misogyny, using the sexism card once again.
Of course, this is pure nonsense, a web of fantasy woven by a sore loser. The day after the interview, President Trump tweeted “FBI Director Comey was the best thing that ever happened to Hillary Clinton in that he gave her a free pass for many bad deeds!” Comey could have recommended an indictment of Clinton, but he refused to pursue charges, even though he castigated her for “extremely careless” handling of top secret email communications.
The WikiLeaks disclosures exposed the Clinton campaign using improper influence with the Democratic National Committee and the media to steal the party’s nomination away from U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT). Without such unfair advantages, Clinton may have lost the nomination to a 74-year old socialist, an amazing situation for a candidate with so many advantages, including having a former President as a husband.
In her imaginary world of victimhood, Clinton now wants to galvanize opposition to Donald Trump. Reports have surfaced that next week she will officially launch a new organization called “Onward Together.” She wants to capitalize on the motivated left-wing activism protesting the President. Her supposed new mission can be summarized in her recent statement to supporters, “let resistance plus persistence equal progress for our party and our country.”
Ironically, many of the left-wing activists challenging the President are supporters of Bernie Sanders and not Hillary Clinton. They realize how horrible a candidate Hillary Clinton was in both of her losing presidential campaigns, 2008 and 2016. Thus, even though Hillary is becoming “part of the resistance,” it is not clear how warmly the hardcore liberal activists will welcome her.
Notwithstanding her rhetoric and blame shifting, Clinton did not lose because of outside influences; she lost because she was a horrible candidate with an unpleasant personality. She does not exude warmth or empathy like her husband, in fact, she has a reputation for being the “Queen of Mean.” For example, numerous security officers who served in her protection detail in both Arkansas and the White House claim she is a nasty person with a horrible temper. This anger and selfishness was also apparent on the 2016 campaign trail.
It is not surprising that during her race against Donald Trump, she did not connect with the millions of average Americans who struggled during the Obama years. These voters in the Rust Belt and other areas of the country were looking for a champion and they found that in the candidacy of Donald Trump, not Hillary Clinton
Clinton spent over $1.2 billion in the general election, outspending Trump 2-1. Even though she possessed this incredible paid media advantage and the so-called objective news media were totally behind her, Clinton still lost to her underdog opponent.
Today, Democrats continue to obsess over a supposed Russian-Trump connection. This exercise in futility is a diversion from the soul searching the party should be doing to understand their historic loss.
It is obvious that Hillary and her party will do almost anything rather than examine their own failings. Instead of looking in the mirror, they prefer focusing on a make-believe world of conspirators and political opponents plotting to deny their candidate her long overdue victory.
While some Americans might like to believe this fairy tale, most prefer reality. In the real world, the only person to blame for the Democrat Party’s embarrassing loss is Hillary Clinton.
Why insult slugs like that? Sure, they’re slimy and disgusting, and destroy or befoul everything they touch, but there’s no reason to demote them to Hillary’s level, even by association.
Does this mean she will run again in 2020?
Hillary’s legacy to me will be the 21st century’s skidmark on US Presidential Elections... not the fecal kind in one’s underwear...the American people slammed the brakes on runaway Globalist Kleptocracy politics as usual...
She needs to be held accountable for any thing that happens during her revenge campaign.
She needs to be held accountable for any thing that happens during her life
You are concerned with Hillary’s rancid soul. You are a much better person than I. Thank you for the lesson on how I should try to be.
...irresponsible, lying,corrupt,enabling,unsavory, Ill temptered individual.
Yes.
Excellent reminder of how a patriot acts.
It’s not just Mrs Bill who is the sore loser; it’s tens of millions of her sycophants too.
Excellent reminder of how a patriot acts.
Richard Nixon played the role of good loser in 1960, but supposedly both he and Pat thought the results had been rigged against Nixon.
You are quite correct. Were this a simple contest between 2 viable candidates she would be magnanimous and would rebuild her bruised image. The utter and irrevocable rejection of Hillary Clinton by the American electorate, notably, the Deplorables, cannot be vindicated by her or by the political movement she represents. The loser is Progressivism, Communism, Socialism, liberalism in all its vicious forms. But it is not an absolute loss.
There remain, in addition to the True Believers - those who are addicted to the absolute authority of an all-encompassing state - the witless. These include the nieve sentimentalists who so-wanted a woman as president and the intellectually vapid who fall in love with tyrants because they are strong and good. But by far the most dangerous segment of Hillary worshippers are The Angry. They are the liberal equivelant of The Deplorables with one significant difference. Whereas the Deplorables are such due to their commitment to God, Country, Guns and the Bible, The Angry are haters.
The Angry are young potheads, black disenfranchised, sexually or otherwise morally deviant, elitists suffering loss of prestige and media moralists. These are the genuinely deplorable. Their hatred is focussed like a laser on the very icons held most dear by the Deplorables. As such they are, in Hillary’s prescient words, irredeemable. Except, not quite.
The way out of hate is love. In their own words, Love Trump’s Hate. And it does, or, more specifically, Trump does. Many of the Progressive haters will come, in time, to love Trump. They will see that Trump has restored dignity, honor, integrity, and love to our body politic. Now they are bitter and ironic. In time with the daily blessing of the Trump presidency they will be relieved of the burden of their anger. They will become reborn Deplorables who have found the Love they so desperately seek.
Revelation 2:21 New International Version
“I have given her time to repent of her immorality, but she is unwilling.”
Not only is she the sorest loser but she’s also a Sorost loser.
Her only solution to her loss is raise money, to enrich herself once more. Any one giving to her “resistance” PAc is unAmerican like her and is a fool.
Onward Together.
Just rolls off the mouth like the Marxist version of the Tea Party. Should be worth a few hundred million.
she is addicted to pity
I would have had her take saxophone lessons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.