[Mrs. Don-o]

Crazy thing is, Bret Stephens didn't even "dispute" anthropogenic climate change. He practically stipulated it from the outset. He just said other hypotheses can still be considered, questions can still be raised, and spurious "certainty" should be rejected.

For this, he´s a planet-destroying, hurricane-causing, puppy-crushing fascist.

Consensus Clubhouse. Please check your brain at the door. You won´t be needing it.

[HiTech RedNeck]

The real blasphemy is to ask if we can prove that AGW is more than a breath in a tornado of earthly events.

That’s when the fanatical, religious adherence shows itself.

He made the mistake of not wanting to check his brain at the door. Instead he said why not put it on the altar of science. Argh! Spffft! No Fair! Gaia will disapprove!